2
…54% Investment Slump Triggers Fresh Industrial Push
LAGOS – Investment in Nigeria’s production and manufacturing sector has plunged sharply, even as overall capital inflows into the country surged to record levels, exposing deep structural weaknesses in Africa’s largest economy and prompting a fresh government push to revive industrialisation.
Data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) show that foreign investment into production and manufacturing fell by 54.11 percent in the first nine months of 2025. The sector attracted just $463.52 million between January and September 2025, down from $1.01 billion recorded during the same period in 2024.
The steep decline comes against the backdrop of a dramatic increase in overall capital importation. Total inflows into Nigeria more than doubled year-on-year, rising by 131.96 percent to $16.78 billion in the first nine months of 2025, compared to $7.23 billion in the corresponding period, last year.
The sharp divergence between booming headline capital inflows and collapsing manufacturing investment has intensified debate about the quality, durability and long-term impact of Nigeria’s economic recovery.
A closer review of the capital importation data paints a troubling picture. In the third quarter of 2025 alone, portfolio investment — often described as “hot money” due to its short-term nature — accounted for 80.7 percent of total inflows, amounting to $4.85 billion.
By contrast, foreign direct investment (FDI), typically associated with long-term productive ventures such as factories, plants and infrastructure, lagged far behind at $296.25 million during the same period.
Production and manufacturing attracted only $261.35 million in Q3 2025 — representing a mere 4.35 percent of total capital inflows.
For an economy long seeking to diversify away from oil dependence and deepen domestic production, the numbers represent a significant setback.
While improved investor confidence in Nigeria’s foreign exchange market reforms and monetary tightening has helped draw in portfolio funds, analysts warn that speculative inflows cannot substitute for sustained industrial investment.
“Portfolio flows can exit as quickly as they enter,” one Lagos-based economist noted. “Without strong FDI into manufacturing and production, job creation and value addition remain weak.”
The contrast between rising capital importation and declining manufacturing investment has sparked concerns about the underlying health of Nigeria’s economy.
Portfolio investors are typically attracted by high yields in government securities, improved exchange rate transparency, and arbitrage opportunities. But such funds are highly sensitive to global risk sentiment and domestic macroeconomic stability.
Manufacturing investment, on the other hand, depends heavily on infrastructure quality, policy stability, energy reliability, logistics efficiency and access to foreign exchange for raw materials and machinery.
Industry operators argue that despite ongoing reforms, structural bottlenecks remain significant. Power shortages, elevated borrowing costs, currency volatility earlier in the year, and import dependence continue to weigh on the sector.
Although inflationary pressures have shown early signs of moderation, financing conditions remain tight. Interest rates are still elevated relative to historical averages, raising the cost of capital for manufacturers.
“The surge in capital inflows is encouraging at a macro level,” another analyst said. “But if it is not translating into productive capacity expansion, then the recovery remains fragile.”
In response to the worrying trend, the Federal Government has launched a new industrial blueprint — Industrial Policy 2025 — aimed at reinvigorating domestic production and boosting manufacturing’s contribution to gross domestic product (GDP).
The policy targets increasing manufacturing’s share of GDP to 15 percent by 2030, a significant leap from current levels estimated in single digits.
Officials say the strategy will focus on improving infrastructure, strengthening local supply chains, supporting export-oriented industries, and enhancing access to affordable finance for manufacturers.
The government also plans to prioritise sectors with strong multiplier effects, including agro-processing, textiles, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals and light manufacturing.
Policy advisers argue that Nigeria’s large domestic market of over 200 million people provides a natural foundation for industrial growth, if structural constraints are properly addressed.
However, achieving the 15 percent GDP target will require not just policy declarations but sustained implementation, regulatory consistency and improved investor confidence.
Despite reform efforts, several structural challenges continue to dampen investor appetite for long-term manufacturing commitments.
Energy remains a central concern. Manufacturers rely heavily on self-generated power due to unreliable grid supply, significantly increasing operating costs. Logistics bottlenecks at ports and poor road infrastructure further add to production expenses.
Access to foreign exchange, though improved compared to previous years, has also been a recurring issue for firms dependent on imported machinery and raw materials.
Additionally, high inflation has eroded consumer purchasing power, affecting demand for locally produced goods. Weak domestic demand reduces incentives for capacity expansion.
There are also concerns about policy unpredictability in previous years, which made long-term planning difficult for foreign investors.
While recent reforms in the foreign exchange market have improved transparency and boosted capital inflows, analysts caution that restoring manufacturing investment will require sustained macroeconomic stability.
The decline in manufacturing investment raises fears of a “jobless recovery,” where macroeconomic indicators improve but employment growth remains subdued.
Manufacturing is widely regarded as a critical engine for mass employment, technology transfer and value chain development. Unlike portfolio investment, which mainly impacts financial markets, manufacturing investment directly generates jobs across skill levels.
A sustained contraction in industrial investment could undermine efforts to reduce unemployment and poverty.
“If Nigeria’s capital inflows are concentrated in treasury bills and bonds rather than factories and plants, the broader economy will feel limited impact,” an industry expert warned.
This risk is particularly significant for a country with a rapidly growing youth population entering the labour force annually.
The success of the new Industrial Policy 2025 will hinge on its ability to tackle fundamental cost disadvantages faced by local manufacturers.
Experts say priorities should include: expanding reliable electricity supply, deepening domestic raw material sourcing, improving port efficiency and customs processes, reducing regulatory bottlenecks, providing targeted tax incentives tied to performance, strengthening access to long-term development finance.
Some analysts argue that aligning monetary and fiscal policy will be crucial. High interest rates may help stabilise the currency and attract portfolio flows, but they simultaneously constrain industrial borrowing.
The Road To 2030
As the government targets a 15 percent manufacturing GDP contribution by 2030, the next few years will prove decisive.
Reversing a 54 percent investment decline will require not only policy ambition but execution discipline, infrastructure upgrades and investor reassurance.
If Industrial Policy 2025 succeeds, Nigeria could gradually shift from a consumption-heavy, import-dependent economy toward a production-driven growth model.
If it falters, the country risks remaining vulnerable to volatile portfolio flows, external shocks and limited job creation.
For now, the numbers tell a clear story: capital is returning to Nigeria — but factories are not yet rising with it.
