Mining lithium for batteries is a growing part of South Africa’s plan to use the global shift towards green energy to revive its economy, but now it faces a challenge from thousands of angry farmers who fear losing productive land to open-pit mines. On the southeast coast, where a lithium mine operates and more than a dozen prospecting licences have been granted since 2023, scores of generations-old farming communities are relocating. A coalition of activists is launching objections to the prospecting, which according to one group, the Sugar Cane Growers Association (SCGA), threatens 30,000 jobs in farming, labouring or services in this sugar-exporting and tourism hub. Data from South Africa’s mines department reviewed by Reuters show lithium prospecting licences laying claim to some 73,000 hectares (282 square miles), an area slightly larger than the city of Pretoria. Most of it is farmland spanning 117 farms, but also beaches. The existing lithium mine, which also plans to expand, covers 150 hectares of pits and 180 hectares of waste dumps.A clash of green ambitionsAs the climate crisis and disrupted oil shipments from the U.S.-Iran war propel investment in clean energy, South Africa has made critical minerals key to its economic revival plans. President Cyril Ramaphosa in February told parliament South Africa had 40 trillion rand ($2.39 trillion) worth of critical minerals, describing them as a “sunrise industry” with potential to create jobs and strengthen the industrial base.But for farmers on the southeast coast, the lithium rush feels less like a sunrise and more like a storm. “Should all these prospecting licences be granted mining licences, the impact would be catastrophic,” SCGA General Manager Heather McLoed said,, according to Reuters. “It affects the small-scale farmers directly, their communities, their shops, and … the sugar mill” handling their harvests, she said at the mill, which crushes 2 million metric tons of cane a year from 2,000 small-scale and 600 commercial growers.Villagers losing homes and healthOn an afternoon in June, Albert Mthembu, 62, was examining the fissures in his brick bungalow in the hillside village of Magog, in the eastern KwaZulu-Natal province, the largest of the country’s three lithium hotspots. He told Reuters the fissures were caused by blasting from the mines.An excavator on the adjacent hill was kicking up clouds of dust as it shifted rocks; Mthembu had visited the doctor twice for lung issues. Having lived in Magog since he was 6, he wanted his children to inherit the house and neat lawn occupied by chickens. Now, he sees no option but to move.“The blasting isn’t good. We’ve got kids, we’ve got animals, the trees are even being damaged,” he said on the slopes of the village, where dying trees drooped, as per Reuters.Mthembu’s friend has already left, his house reduced to rubble by workers expanding the mine, according to three villagers. Seven other houses were visibly dismantled. Reuters interviewed 11 farmers in the area, all of whom shared similar concerns.Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the mineral resources department did not respond to Reuters’ request for comment.The privately owned mining company was relocating villagers, but many were unhappy with the new land, Mthembu said, as it was remote and less suitable for planting. SA Lithium Director Ian Harbottle said it had relocated 150 farmers, all willingly. “If there’s one challenge, I’m unable to move them fast (enough) because everybody is significantly better off,” he said, as per the report.The carbon paradoxClean energy requires less material extraction than the fossil fuel industry it is replacing. A 2024 Breakthrough Institute paper showed that coal, South Africa’s power-generation staple, extracts 1,180 tons of material per gigawatt, on average, compared with 59 tons for wind and 45 tons for solar, including all the minerals for battery storage in an average installation.Yet landscape-scarring mining remains a contentious part of the transition in countries from Portugal to the United States. Rock waste can degrade land quality, as has happened in Australia and China.“Yes, it … does make a hole. Yes, there are dumps, but we’ve done extensive (anti-pollution) work. We are more than compliant,” Harbottle said, adding that the mine had created over a thousand jobs.According to one farmers’ submission on SA Lithium’s plans to expand over 6,000 hectares, the mine could “permanently degrade water quality, soil quality and reduce the long-term viability of farming”. Harbottle disputes that. “No water from the mine ever goes into any of the rivers” but into dams to be used for processing or dust suppression, he said.A future at stakeSA Lithium’s operations are tiny compared with the area being prospected, where farmers grow an annual million tons of cane and macadamia nuts. That worries locals more than the existing mine.“The future of farming here is gone,” said Joe Nkala, 51, a cane-growing consultant to small farmers, on a hilltop with sugar farms down one side and a black-grey gash on the other. “My kids will have to find a new life.”For South Africa, the lithium boom represents a chance to position itself as a key player in the global green-energy supply chain. But for the farmers of KwaZulu-Natal, it represents a threat to their land, their livelihoods and their way of life. As the world races to decarbonise, the human cost of that transition is becoming impossible to ignore.(With inputs from Reuters)
