The Supreme Court has indefinitely
adjourned proceedings in the suit challenging the appointment of Martin A.B.K.
Amidu as Special Prosecutor by President Akufo-Addo.
This is to allow the Chief Justice,
Justice Sophia Akuffo to reconstitute the seven-member panel hearing the
The reconstitution of the
panel was occasioned by the impending compulsory retirement of one of the panel
members, Justice Sophia Adinyira which is due on July 31 this year.
The panel has indicated that
they may not be able to see the case to its logical conclusion before their
colleague judge proceeds on her retirement hence the need for the panel to be
The court at its last sitting
had ordered the Office of the Attorney General and NDC Member of Parliament
(MP) for Bolgatanga, Dr. Dominic Ayine, who is challenging Mr. Amidu’s
appointment based on age, to file further legal arguments within three weeks.
The order of the court
followed the filling of the memorandum of issues by both parties in the case as
directed by the court in February this year.
Tony Lithur, who is counsel
for Dr. Ayine, told the court that he had met the Deputy Attorney General
Godfred Yeboah Dame and they had agreed on the issues to consider and had
subsequently filed the memorandum of issues.
He, therefore, asked the court
for directions on the way forward.
The seven-member panel of the
court presided over by Justice Julius Ansah, with Justices Sophia Adinyira,
Anin Yeboah, Baffoe-Bonnie, Sulemana Gbadegbe, Samuel Marful Siau and Agnes
Dordzie, as members directed the parties to file legal arguments in three
Dr. Ayine filed a suit at the
Supreme Court challenging Mr. Amidu’s age to be appointed as Ghana’s first Special
The NDC MP, who was the Deputy
Attorney General under the previous Mahama administration, is seeking a relief,
including “a declaration that by a true and proper interpretation of Articles
190 (1) (d), 199 (1) (4) and 295 of the 1992 Constitution, the required age of
all holders of public offices created pursuant to Article 190 (1) (d), is 60
years, anyhow not beyond 65 years.”
The Attorney General’s Office,
in its response to the suit, prayed the Supreme Court to dismiss the suit,
saying the suit is being “borne out of narrow, inadequate and literal
construction of the scope of the application of Article 199 of the
He averred that Mr. Amidu is
not “a proper party to the suit” as the action seeks to challenge the Attorney
General’s decision to nominate Mr. Amidu as the Special Prosecutor, as well as
his presentation by the President for Parliament to approve.
He stated that the decision to
appoint Mr. Amidu was taken in the course of the official duties of the
President and AG and Mr. Amidu can therefore not be a party to the suit.
He prayed the court to dismiss the suit and the court agreed with the Deputy AG and subsequently struck out the name of Mr. Amidu as defendant in the suit.
BY Gibril Abdul Razak