You lied to Ghanaians to defeat NPP, and we shall give you a dose of your own medicine – Mandeya

In an Official Facebook Post on 31 October 2026, political commentator Safianu Mandeya shared a sharp critique of contemporary political communication standards in Ghana. Mandeya lamented the growing reliance on insults, personal attacks, and sensationalism on media platforms, contrasting the current trend with more fact-based and document-driven strategies of the past.

Reflecting on the degradation of political discourse on radio and television talk shows, Mandeya questioned the metrics by which modern political communicators are judged by party supporters and media outlets alike. He criticized the shift away from policy solutions and critical thinking toward trivial gossip and retaliatory rhetoric, noting that some political figures operate under the assumption that political combat requires matching past opposition tactics measure for measure.

Highlighting the contrasting approach of seasoned political communicators who rely on thorough research and evidentiary documentation, Mandeya praised figures who maintain intellectual rigor during national debates. He argued that true political dominance is achieved through data, preparation, and analytical depth rather than turning studio discussions into verbal boxing matches.

The commentary touches upon broader concerns shared by civil society organizations, media watchdogs, and governance experts regarding the toxic nature of partisan media broadcasts in Ghana. Analysts have repeatedly warned that the trivialization of critical national issues—such as environmental degradation, economic policy, and illegal mining (galamsey)—disserves the electorate by drowning out substantive policy debates.

Observers note that Mandeya’s post captures the frustration of citizens who expect political elites and media houses to elevate public discourse rather than pander to sensationalism. The commentary serves as a reminder that the quality of national debate directly shapes democratic accountability and voter education.

At its core, the statement advocates for a return to intellectual discipline, factual accountability, and constructive engagement in Ghanaian politics. Mandeya’s analysis emphasizes that political victory and public trust are best sustained through credible alternative policies and verifiable facts rather than retaliatory mudslinging.

The social media post has drawn significant engagement across political discussion groups, media analysis forums, and public policy networks. While some commentators acknowledged the reality of retaliatory political communication, many agreed with Mandeya’s call for higher standards of professionalism among media broadcasters and political parties alike.

Source: Safianu Mandeya, Official Facebook Post, 31 October 2026