Miracles knows all categories of NPP members allowed to use & are using diplomatic passports –Muslim

In an Official Facebook Post published on 30 October 2026, journalist and public affairs commentator Shamima Muslim weighed into the growing controversy surrounding diplomatic and service passports in Ghana, arguing that the New Patriotic Party (NPP) should first take action within its own ranks if it seeks to advance concerns about the alleged misuse of official travel documents.

Her comments come in the wake of recent political debates over the issuance of diplomatic and service passports, a matter that has attracted significant public attention following allegations and counter-allegations about who qualifies to hold such documents and whether established procedures are being followed.

According to Shamima Muslim, the issue should not be approached purely from a partisan perspective but rather from a standpoint of consistency and principle. She suggested that if the NPP genuinely believes there are concerns regarding the issuance and use of diplomatic and service passports, then the party should begin by encouraging its own members who currently possess such documents to voluntarily surrender them pending the resolution of the controversy.

In her post, she directly addressed NPP communicator Dennis Miracles Aboagye, popularly known as Miracles, and argued that he possesses sufficient knowledge of the various categories of party members who are either entitled to or currently making use of diplomatic passports.

According to Shamima Muslim, the call for accountability should apply across the political divide rather than being focused solely on allegations against political opponents. For that reason, she believes the opposition party should demonstrate leadership by taking practical steps within its own ranks before demanding action from others.

The commentary reflects a broader debate currently unfolding within Ghana’s political landscape regarding the issuance, eligibility, and oversight of diplomatic and service passports. Such documents are generally reserved for government officials, diplomats, and individuals undertaking official state assignments. Because of the privileges associated with these passports, allegations of irregular issuance often generate considerable public interest.

Shamima Muslim’s intervention introduces another dimension to the discussion by emphasizing what she considers the importance of consistency. Her position appears to suggest that demanding transparency from state institutions should be matched by a willingness among political actors to subject themselves to similar levels of scrutiny.

A key aspect of her argument is the proposal that NPP members currently benefiting from diplomatic passport arrangements should voluntarily suspend their use until any concerns surrounding eligibility and issuance are conclusively addressed. In her view, such a step would strengthen the party’s credibility and demonstrate commitment to the principles it is advocating.

Political observers note that debates about diplomatic passports often extend beyond administrative procedures and become symbols of broader conversations about accountability, transparency, and public trust. As a result, discussions about who qualifies for such documents frequently attract both political and public attention.

The comments have generated discussion across social media platforms, where users have expressed differing opinions on the matter. Some have agreed with Shamima Muslim’s call for a uniform standard to be applied to all political actors, arguing that accountability should never be selective. Others contend that the focus should remain on investigating specific allegations and ensuring relevant institutions provide clarity regarding passport issuance processes.

As the controversy continues to unfold, perspectives such as those expressed by Shamima Muslim are likely to contribute to the wider national conversation about governance, transparency, and the responsibilities of political parties in promoting public confidence in state institutions.

Whether her proposal gains traction within political circles remains to be seen, but her comments have undoubtedly added another layer to an already intense debate over the management and use of diplomatic and service passports in Ghana.

Source: Shamima Muslim, Official Facebook Post, 30 October 2026