“President Ramaphosa Wants To Kill Us” March And March Leader Jacinta Zuma Breaks Silence

The March and March Movement has raised concerns about its safety amid growing political tensions in South Africa, with the movement alleging that President Cyril Ramaphosa wants to kill its leaders.

The serious allegation has intensified questions about the relationship between the anti-illegal immigration movement and the government, particularly as activists continue to demand stronger border controls, stricter enforcement of immigration laws and action against undocumented foreign nationals.

However, the allegation that Ramaphosa wants to kill the movement’s leaders has not been independently verified, and no evidence establishing that the President has made such a threat has been confirmed in the information available.

The movement, led by Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, has been at the centre of controversial demonstrations calling for the government to prioritise South African citizens and address concerns about undocumented immigration.

In recent months, the organisation has also accused authorities of attempting to intimidate its leadership because of its protests and demands.

On 14 October 2026, the movement claimed that arrest warrants had been issued for Ngobese-Zuma and Xolani Zuma, the acting chief executive officer of the SA First Forum. The organisation alleged that the planned arrests were politically motivated and connected to its mobilisation efforts ahead of the local government elections.

The National Prosecuting Authority subsequently rejected the claim that arrest warrants had been issued against the two individuals. The South African Police Service also dismissed the reports, stating that there was no record of a case against them. These responses contradicted the movement’s claims of imminent arrests.

The latest allegation concerning Ramaphosa comes against this backdrop of mistrust between the movement and the authorities.

The organisation has repeatedly expressed frustration over what it considers the government’s failure to adequately address illegal immigration. Its supporters argue that stronger immigration enforcement is necessary to protect employment opportunities, improve border security and ensure compliance with South African law.

However, the government has maintained that protests must remain peaceful and that immigration enforcement must be conducted within the law.

Ramaphosa previously warned that the right to protest does not give anyone permission to threaten, intimidate or engage in violence. His remarks came amid nationwide demonstrations over undocumented immigration and growing concerns about possible attacks against foreign nationals.

The allegations against the President are particularly serious because they concern the safety of political activists and the conduct of the country’s highest public office.

If the movement believes its leaders are facing credible threats, the appropriate authorities would need to investigate any supporting evidence and determine whether criminal conduct has occurred.

At the same time, the President’s alleged involvement should not be presented as an established fact without verifiable evidence or an official response.

The controversy highlights the increasingly strained relationship between immigration activists and the South African government as the country approaches another period of intense political campaigning.

For now, the central question remains whether the movement can substantiate its allegation against Ramaphosa. Until credible evidence emerges, the claim remains an allegation rather than a proven fact.

Source: https://x.com/ZANewsFlash/status/2115025107232157787