Data Transfers, Wisdom Does Not: Preparing People For Retirement Protects Organizations, Too

This voice experience is generated by AI. Learn more.This voice experience is generated by AI. Learn more.Vikas Arora is an OD expert and cofounder of Princeton Academy, helping organizations build cultures people stay for.

gettyI have watched a lot of senior people leave organizations. The paperwork is handled well, the farewell party is arranged, gifts are presented and everyone assumes that whatever needed to be passed to the next person has already been passed. Some months later, the organization discovers how much judgment and context walked out with him, and the person themselves discovers that nobody prepared them for a life without the work. Both the organization and the individual do not adequately prepare for the years that follow.

For senior people leaving a large organization, the financial side is usually settled through superannuation. The harder question is one almost nobody asks out loud. Am I psychologically prepared to manage myself when I no longer have to go to work?

Until that morning, you were working at the request, directions and challenges of your environment. Then the environment goes away, and the day in front of you is a clean slate. What do you do with yourself?

Most people picture something rather pleasant. I will retire, I will live peacefully, I will have my tea and go for a walk. It turns out otherwise. When nobody has coached a person into this transition, the degeneration is quick. I have seen senior executives who, within a few years of retiring, were beyond recognition. The family begins to nag, medical needs increase and the mind, with nothing built for it to do, drifts toward things that produce nothing.

An organization is only as good as its people are energetic, physically and mentally, at their workplace. When a person’s retirement is delayed and he is no longer fit, his judgment suffers and so does his reading of the information in front of him.

Where an organization has no clearly defined retirement policy, the people below lose morale because the roles they were working toward stay occupied indefinitely. This man will never retire, so why am I working here? And the wait costs them more than it used to. A generational divide once took 15 or 18 years of age difference. Now, eight to 10 years is enough for the whole way of learning and seeing the environment to be completely different.

Knowledge transfer at the moment of retirement is difficult, and most organizations attempt it too late. The knowledge has to live in the system rather than the individual, and even then, something stays behind.

At the end of my career, I can hand over the files, but I cannot hand over the wisdom. Data is transferred. Wisdom is not. The understanding, the relationships, the depth, the sensitivity—none of that passes in a handover meeting.

Whether any of it transfers depends on how the organization treats someone in their final years. I recently came across a colleague, an HR head due for promotion. Everything was set, and the managing director was calling him directly. The promotion did not come. When he looked into it, he found the policy. Anyone within 18 to 24 months of retirement cannot be promoted. You are treating me as though I am already retired, so I will also live like that. And then what incentive do I have to transfer what I know to the next person?

It should not matter when someone is due to retire. If they have earned a promotion, recognize them. Seek their advice, whether or not you use it. Ask them to think, to speak, to write, to create something that can be shared with the people coming behind. Then the knowledge transfers on its own, instead of being extracted from someone on their last afternoon in exchange for a gift.

ZipRecruiter’s 2026 research on phased retirement​ found that 61% of workers over 60 “would stay one year or more in a reduced-hours wind-down role,” and 27% “would stay five years or more” under a phased arrangement. The runway exists. Most organizations never ask for it.

At Princeton Academy, we work on two aspects with people at this stage, and the first is financial. Prepare your income and expenditure. Clear your loans and liabilities, and sort out the wills and property papers. Decide what you intend to leave to which child and keep that clear in your head without announcing it. Avoid being extravagant, because if you are fortunate, you may live another 30 or 40 years. However, you will not get another job in that time, and your ability to earn will only shrink.

The second is carrying yourself physically and mentally through the years that follow. Give your time to your health and food and to the environment around you. Prepare for people to slowly withdraw from you, including your own children. I say that without bitterness because most of us did not spend that time with our own parents either. Give them the same allowance you would have wanted at that age, and build a life that does not depend on their attention.

An organization that helps its people prepare gets back something no policy can manufacture. People who are ready to go, go, while their judgment is still sharp and the path below them is still open. What they know transfers across the years they were respected rather than in a meeting on their final afternoon.

We spend decades preparing people to work. The organizations that handle this well spend a little of that time preparing them to stop.​

Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?