I Will Continue to Blame Citi 97.3 FM for Selling This Hollow Woman to Us as Some Big Brain – Animah

In an Official Facebook Post by Adwoa Animah on 20 October 2026, the commentator launched a scathing critique of broadcaster and activist Shamima Muslim, accusing her of selective outrage and hypocrisy in her political commentary. Her post, captioned “I will continue to blame Citi 97.3 FM for selling this hollow woman to us as some big brain”, was both personal and political, reflecting frustration with how public figures engage with issues of accountability.

Animah’s tone was biting and sarcastic. She recalled how Shamima had previously “lost her mind” when some NPP women staged a demonstration against the detention of a nurse they believed innocent, questioning what society had done for women. Yet, she argued, Shamima has remained conspicuously silent now that her own party, the NDC, has cleared a man accused of sexually abusing 19 young girls entrusted to his care at Obuasi Senior High Technical School (SHTS). Instead of addressing this grave matter, Animah claimed, Shamima preferred to discuss trivialities such as “John Mahama’s favourite sitting position.”

This commentary reflects the theme of selective activism and credibility in political communication. Animah accused Shamima of being more concerned with partisan narratives than with the safety and dignity of victims. Her critique underscores the frustration of citizens who expect consistency from public advocates, particularly those who present themselves as champions of women’s rights.

At a deeper level, the post highlights the intersection of feminism, politics, and moral accountability. Animah’s rebuke suggests that advocacy loses credibility when it appears partisan or opportunistic. By contrasting Shamima’s outrage over the nurse’s detention with her silence on the Obuasi scandal, Animah dramatized the tension between symbolic activism and substantive advocacy. Her words serve as a reminder that credibility in public discourse requires consistency, especially when vulnerable groups are at stake.

Observers note that this debate resonates with broader concerns about trust in public figures and the politicization of social justice in Ghana. Citizens are increasingly skeptical of voices that appear to defend principles selectively, depending on which party is implicated. Animah’s post channels this skepticism, urging Ghanaians to scrutinize not only political actors but also the commentators who shape public opinion.

In conclusion, Adwoa Animah’s post “I will continue to blame Citi 97.3 FM for selling this hollow woman to us as some big brain” is both a personal rebuke and a broader critique of selective activism. It dramatizes the clash between partisan loyalty and moral duty, reminding Ghanaians that advocacy must be consistent to be credible. Her words serve as a call to demand accountability not only from politicians but also from those who claim to speak for justice.

Source: Adwoa Animah, Official Facebook Post, 20 October 2026

NewsExpress feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com