The Legal Affairs Directorate of the National Democratic Congress has condemned âin no uncertain terms the unwarranted scathing attacksâ by the Attorney-General, Godfred Dame, on former President Mahama.
The Attorney General who was addressing lawyers at the Ghana Bar Association Annual Conference in Ho yesterday raised concerns over what he describes as unjustified attacks on Ghanaâs Judiciary by former President John Dramani Mahama.
Mr. Dame said the unwarranted utterances dent the image of the judiciary, a development that threatens the peace and well-being of the country.
Reacting to his comments, the NDCâs Director of Legal Affairs, Abraham Amaliba said Mr. Dameâs âunjustified outburst is characteristic of the arrogant posturing of his boss, Nana Akufo-Addo, and his failing government that is allergic to divergent views and opinions on national issues.â
âWe are not surprised because many citizens who have been critical of Akufo-Addoâs government have suffered one form of attack or another from this intolerant government,â he added.
He said the Attorney Generalâs partisanship and bias as an NPP member are not in doubt.
âHowever, one would have thought that he would be mindful of his position as the Minister for Justice and leader of the Bar, which requires that he demonstrates a certain degree of maturity required of him by virtue of his position.â
âUnfortunately, that is not the case. Sometimes, Mr. Dame speaks like a typical NPP foot soldier other than a lawyer and for that matter the Attorney-General.â
The party finds the Attorney Generalâs choice of the Bar Conference to make the pronouncements disrespectful to lawyers and the legal profession.
Mr. Amaliba cited the Supreme Courtâs failure to allow the EC Chairperson to enter the witness box during the 2020 election petition case and said it is not surprising that the recent Afrobarometer report published by the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD) revealed a decline in citizensâ trust in the Judiciary by 21 percentage points between 2012 and 2022.
He could not fathom how former President Mahamaâs observations about the judiciary and calls for reforms in the face of the declining trust in same could be seen as an attack on the judiciary.
âGhanaâs National Security Strategy in its risk analysis has identified mistrust in the Judiciary as a major threat to Ghanaâs democratic stability. This, therefore, requires reforms that would restore citizensâ trust in such an important institution. Every well-meaning Ghanaian must be concerned about thisâ
He doesnât see why former President John Mahama should be attacked for expressing his opinion on the state of the judiciary.
âWhy should that warrant an attack from the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, who should rather be concerned about the issues raised and take steps to address them? Just a couple of days ago, H.E. Kamala Harris, Vice President of the United States of America had cause to excoriate the US Supreme Court over Roe V Wade decision. Should that be considered as an attack on the Supreme Court, or for that matter the Judiciary?â
He reminded the Attorney General that Ghana is a democratic country.
âCitizens, including former President Mahama have the right to freely express themselves. There is no institution that is precluded from scrutiny,â he added.
John Dramani Mahama called for a change in the leadership of the countryâs judiciary to repair what he describes as its broken image.
Mr. Mahama stated that, the current state of the judiciary has sunk so low that it has lost the trust and faith of the ordinary person.