Post-apartheid South Africa inherited both a promise and a paradox. The democratic transition of 1994 envisioned a capable developmental state rooted in accountability, transparency, and social justice. Yet, three decades later, the state apparatus is increasingly characterized by ethical decay, administrative inefficiency, and institutional capture. Ironically, while political and executive leadership often operate amid corruption and mismanagement, they continue to demand ethical conduct and heightened performance from a public service that is underpaid, under-resourced, and frequently marginalised in decision-making.
This contradiction demands urgent scrutiny. The burden of integrity has been unfairly shifted onto a weakened public service, while those at the apex of power evade accountability. Without ethical leadership at the top, calls for bureaucratic integrity become hollow and reinforce the hypocrisy of South Africa’s political elite.
Ethical Collapse at the Apex
The Commission of Inquiry into State Capture (Zondo Commission) laid bare the extent of institutional manipulation by private interests and political actors. High-profile cases involving Eskom, Transnet, South African Airways, and Denel revealed how senior government officials facilitated the diversion of billions in public funds to politically connected networks. These acts of corruption not only undermined service delivery but also hollowed out institutional capacity, leaving critical agencies incapacitated and demoralised.
The Zondo Commission’s Final Report concluded that “the corruption, mismanagement, and state capture that took place under the executive watch represent a fundamental betrayal of constitutional governance.” This ethical collapse contrasts sharply with the government’s ongoing rhetoric of “clean governance” and “service excellence.”
As Professor Thuli Madonsela aptly noted, “Ethical leadership is not merely a matter of compliance but a precondition for restoring trust in public institutions.” When leaders act with impunity, they erode the moral authority necessary to demand integrity from lower tiers of administration.
The Burden on a Demoralised Bureaucracy
The contradiction of the executive’s expectations on a dangerously weakened public service is both unrealistic and unjust. Public officials are expected to deliver high-quality services and uphold ethical standards within an environment that offers neither adequate remuneration nor institutional support—and is riddled with political interference.
The Public Service Commission’s 2023 report highlights that “morale within the civil service has deteriorated sharply, with widespread frustration over political interference, wage stagnation, and the lack of career advancement.” Patronage networks and cadre deployment further constrain professional autonomy, reducing the public service to a tool for private interests.
Local Government: Ground Zero of Dysfunction
At the local government level, this contradiction becomes especially visible. The Auditor-General’s 2023 report revealed that only 38 out of 257 municipalities achieved clean audits. Failures stem largely from political instability, weak oversight, and mismanagement—conditions over which ordinary administrators have little control. Yet, civil servants are often scapegoated for the collapse of basic services such as water provision, waste management, and housing delivery.
This dynamic reinforces a two-tier system of accountability: a politically insulated elite versus an exposed, under-supported public bureaucracy. It undermines the professionalisation of the public service and perpetuates a culture of compliance without capacity.
Ethical Renewal Must Begin at the Top
The remedy to South Africa’s governance crisis lies not in bureaucratic reform alone but in restoring ethical leadership at the highest levels of state. The quality of political leadership directly influences governance outcomes. Ethical renewal can not be imposed from below, but it must be modeled from above.
Despite well-meaning initiatives like the National Framework Towards the Professionalisation of the Public Service (2022), progress remains slow. The framework’s emphasis on merit-based recruitment and ethical training is commendable, but its success depends on consistent political will. As long as political appointments override professional competence, the state will struggle to attract and retain skilled, principled administrators.
Trust Deficit and Democratic Fragility
The moral inconsistency between leadership rhetoric and practice deepens public cynicism. The Afrobarometer Survey (2023) found that only 27% of South Africans trust national government institutions, while 78% believe corruption has worsened in the past five years. This trust deficit weakens democratic legitimacy and disincentivises ethical behavior within the public sector.
South Africa’s governance paradox lies in the widening gap between ethical expectation and political example. The state demands integrity, efficiency, and dedication from a public service that operates under chronic fiscal and institutional strain, even as its political leadership is implicated in systemic corruption and administrative decay.
Conclusion: A Moral Recalibration
Rebuilding South Africa’s state capacity requires more than administrative reforms. It demands a moral recalibration of leadership. Ethical governance must begin at the top, where power and influence reside. Only when executives and politicians embody the ethical standards they demand from public service officials will the public service become a truly professional, credible instrument of national development.
Nkosana Thobela is the Executive Director at The Bpi Foundation NPC. He writes and publishes this article in his own capacity. The views expressed above do not reflect any position(s) of the organisation he leads.
*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or .
BUSINESS REPORT
