As South Africa marks the first anniversary of the Government of National Unity (GNU), questions linger about the influence of the country’s smaller political parties.
Though often described as minor players, these parties – particularly the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), GOOD, and the United Democratic Movement (UDM) – prove that size isn’t everything in parliamentary politics.
Their role in shaping policy and steering the nation’s direction raises essential discussions about the power dynamics within South Africa’s proportional representation system.
In a political landscape dominated by the ANC, DA, and EFF, MK parties, smaller parties like the IFP and GOOD have punched above their weight by leveraging their positions within the GNU to push specific agendas.
IFP leader Velenkosi Hlabisa asserts that his party continues to serve as a “unifying force” within the government, highlighting their impact across portfolios such as Cooperative Governance, Transport, and Environmental Affairs.
Hlabisa highlighted key achievements, including the launch of the White Paper on Local Government Reforms, which aimed to improve service delivery, reintroduce stable train services, and combat corruption within public service.
“Our contributions are impactful and transformative,” he said, underscoring their commitment to social cohesion, rural development, and environmental sustainability.
Similarly, Patricia de Lille, leader of the GOOD party, reflected on their strategic role in the GNU.
Since its inception last year, GOOD has actively influenced the government’s priorities by advocating for spatial transformation, social security, and justice.
“We ensured that issues like spatial inequalities and social grants were integrated into the GNU’s core agenda,” de Lille explained.
Despite being the smallest party, she stated that GOOD’s substantive arguments helped shape the GNU’s “Statement of Intent” and the “Minimum Programme of Priorities,” demonstrating that influence is measured less by size and more by engagement quality.
Brett Herron, Secretary-General of the GOOD Party, emphasised that the proportional representation system allows smaller parties to wield significant influence.
“The strength lies not in the size but in the persuasive substance of our arguments,” he said.
He pointed to the GNU’s negotiations, where GOOD’s insistence on spatial and social issues led to tangible policy commitments.
Hlabisa echoed this sentiment, noting that their role extends beyond mere participation.
“We are widely regarded as a voice of reason, fostering cooperation across diverse identities,” he said.
At the provincial level in KwaZulu-Natal, where the IFP leads the Government of Provincial Unity, the party claims to be actively transforming the province-addressing crime, promoting economic growth, and improving service delivery.
While these small parties celebrate their influence, critics argue that the GNU faces systemic challenges.
Political analyst Joe Mhlanga warns that the government’s effectiveness remains questionable.
“Unemployment and inequality are still unresolved,” he said, pointing to internal disagreements and policy inconsistencies that threaten stability.
Mhlanga also noted recent controversies surrounding South Africa’s foreign policy, such as some GNU members’ visits to Israel, which conflict with the country’s traditional neutrality stance.
“This reflects a broader issue: is the GNU working for all of us, or only for certain factions?” he questioned.
Moreover, the UDM’s leader, General Bantu Holomisa, did not respond to multiple inquiries, leaving questions about the party’s ongoing role in the coalition.
Reflecting on the past year, some analysts suggest that small parties can punch above their weight – if they seize the opportunity.
Despite being the smallest in parliament, Herron pointed out that GOOD was crucial in resolving the BELA Act dispute and influencing the GNU’s priorities.
However, independent political analyst Joe Mhlanga remains cautious.
“The GNU is struggling with internal conflicts and policy inconsistencies,” he said.
“Small parties need to work harder to maintain relevance and influence, especially as larger parties try to dominate the narrative.”
According to Edward Polsue from the Institute of Race Relations, on Tuesday, The Roundtable published an article stating that ANC voters are leaving the party, while the DA is establishing itself as a strong opposition to ANC policies.
“But a house divided cannot stand, and as winter approaches with its attendant likely load-shedding, it seems only a matter of time before the GNU disintegrates.
“Will the ANC recalibrate the coalition by drawing in other much smaller parties, such as Build South Africa and ActionSA, and call the DA’s bluff to leave the coalition? Or does the DA have more to win by staying inside the GNU and the ANC more to lose?” wrote Polsue.
According to Mhlanga, the small parties’ role as kingmakers appears secure now as long as they remain ‘strategic, united, and committed’ to their mandates.
Politics
