Dr. Kabiru Tia Mahama
The Minority in Parliament staged a walkout during the concluding session of the mid-year budget debate, citing what they described as an “abuse of parliamentary procedure” and a worrying manipulation of majoritarian rule.
Addressing the media shortly after the walkout, Member of Parliament for Walewale, Dr. Kabiru Tia Mahama, speaking on behalf of the Minority, condemned what he described as “bizarre parliamentary conduct” that undermines the integrity of legislative debate.
“We have all witnessed what transpired in the chamber today,” Mahama said.
“This is not the first time a mid-year budget has been presented, but it is the first time we have seen such a blatant inversion of the proper procedure,” he added.
The Minority’s Grievance
According to the MP, the Minority took issue with the decision to allow the Deputy Minister for Finance, Thomas Nyarko Ampem, instead of the substantive Minister, to respond to the budget debate, and more significantly, to personally rebut each Minority MP by name who had contributed to the debate over the past four days.
Dr. Mahama Tia described the Deputy Minister’s actions as inappropriate and procedurally offensive.
“The role of the Minister, at this stage, is to thank the House and address general concerns. What we saw instead was an attempt to reopen debate, one-sidedly, and take on every Minority MP who had spoken — including Hon. Amin Adam, Hon. Abena Osei Asare, Hon. Dr. Gideon Boako, and Hon. Afenyo-Markin — many of whom were not present to respond,” he stated.
The Minority insisted this move breached the principle of fair hearing and deviated from established norms.
Abuse of Numbers and Speaker’s Alleged Complicity
Mr. Mahama further accused the NDC Majority of “abusing their numbers” to push through what he termed as “a dangerous precedent.”
“We are seeing the majoritarian system being abused. Worse still, the First Deputy Speaker appears complicit. He allowed the Deputy Minister to veer off course without calling him to order, despite clear objections raised by the Minority,” he asserted.
He questioned whether this new approach was a signal that the Majority’s own members and leadership were incapable of responding effectively to the Minority’s arguments during the debate, which had spanned four days.
“Is it the case that the Majority Leader’s 45-minute contribution was insufficient? Do they consider their own MPs incapable of holding their ground, such that the Deputy Minister must now clean up after them?” he quizzed.
A Matter Of Principle, Not Protest
The Minority emphasised that their walkout was not just a political protest but a principled stand to defend the credibility of parliamentary process.
“We’re not afraid of debate. In fact, we are open to a public town hall to continue the discussion. But we will not legitimise a manipulated process disguised as parliamentary procedure,” Dr. Mahama stated.
He warned that the events, if left unchecked, could erode the democratic standards of parliamentary practice and set a precedent that could harm future deliberations.
“This is the first time in our parliamentary history that a Minister has responded to individual MPs by name after a formal debate has concluded. This cannot stand the test of time,” he intimated.
By Ernest Kofi Adu, Parliament House



