The suspension of Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo by President John Dramani Mahama has stirred significant political controversy, drawing sharp responses from the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) and raising constitutional concerns.
President Mahama’s decision came after receiving three petitions alleging misconduct against the Chief Justice. Acting in line with Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution, he referred the matter to the Council of State, which recommended the formation of a five-member investigative panel. Justice Torkornoo has been temporarily suspended pending the outcome of this investigation.
However, the suspension has raised eyebrows, with critics pointing to its timing and the lack of transparency in the process. Legal professionals and advocacy groups have expressed unease, particularly because the details of the petitions remain secret and legal appeals related to the case are still being pursued.
Skeptics warn that this move could threaten the independence of the judiciary and open the door for political manipulation in future judicial matters. The opaque handling of the petitions has only added to suspicions that the process is politically motivated.
Fatimatu Abubakar, the former Information Minister, condemned the suspension, describing it as a partisan act that could make future judicial appointments vulnerable to political revenge. She argued that removing Torkornoo in such a manner sends a dangerous message to the judiciary.
She also warned that if the NPP regains power, they will challenge appointments they believe stem from political interference. Abubakar urged President Mahama to protect the integrity of the judiciary by rejecting the petitions and lifting the suspension.
“This issue is bigger than Justice Torkornoo,” she stated. “It’s about defending the autonomy of our judiciary and ensuring that no branch of government oversteps its bounds.”
The controversy has sparked national debate on the separation of powers in Ghana, with many closely observing how this situation may shape future relations between the presidency and the judiciary.
Source: MynewsGh