In a post shared on June 5, 2025, Pratt urged a broader understanding of the uprising, particularly regarding the controversial legacy of General I.K. Acheampong, whose role in Ghana’s political and economic history remains hotly debated.
He expressed concern that national conversations about June 4 frequently bypass the critical fact that the uprising culminated in the execution of General Acheampong.
Pratt stressed that this omission distorts the complete picture of events surrounding the era.
Highlighting Acheampong’s contributions, Pratt noted the former Head of State championed a self-reliant economic agenda that saw significant strides in food production.
According to him, “It was General Acheampong who introduced a self-reliant economic programme… under which the country became self-sufficient in food production in only two years.”
He further acknowledged Acheampong’s efforts to revive Ghana’s developmental path post-Nkrumah, referencing his role in resuscitating abandoned national projects.
Additionally, Pratt recalled Acheampong’s support for African liberation movements and the release of pro-Nkrumah detainees, revealing his influence beyond Ghana’s borders.
By revisiting these less-discussed details, Pratt provides a more layered interpretation of June 4—not merely as a revolt against corruption but as a turning point in Ghana’s complex political evolution.