March & March Cries Saying Police Using to Much Force and Rough

A serious incident involving the South African Police Service (SAPS) and members of the March and March Movement has sparked outrage and accusations of excessive force in Durban, with the movement alleging a targeted attack on unarmed civilians. The events, which unfolded on Tuesday, November 10, 2026, near Che Guevara Road, are now at the center of a growing debate about police conduct and the rights of protesters.

According to a statement released by the March and March Movement’s national spokesperson, Sandile Dube, the situation began with a large police contingent approaching approximately 20 civilians who were heading towards traffic lights. The movement asserts that the officers ordered the individuals to return to their tents, a request which they reportedly fulfilled by walking back.

However, Dube alleges that a specific officer, identified as Cele, then opened fire on the returning civilians. The movement’s account directly contradicts the SAPS’s initial report, which stated that the incident occurred after 15:00 and involved members of the March and March Movement violating a court order.

The details emerging from the March and March Movement paint a concerning picture. The movement insists that no organized march was taking place at the time, and that the incident was a deliberate act of aggression.

They claim that officers demanded the civilians surrender their traditional weapons, which they complied with, yet Cele continued to fire without any apparent justification. This assertion raises serious questions about the proportionality of the police response and the potential for abuse of power.

It is clear that the events on Che Guevara Road represent a significant escalation in tensions between the March and March Movement and law enforcement. The movement’s decision to announce further marches in Durban and Gqeberha, coupled with their call for government intervention in Mayfair, Gqeberha, and Point Road, suggests a deliberate strategy to draw attention to what they perceive as systemic issues.

While the SAPS maintains its position regarding a violation of a court order, the movement’s narrative – supported by the alleged actions of a single officer – demands a thorough and impartial investigation. The incident highlights the delicate balance between the right to protest and the responsibility of law enforcement to maintain order.

The lack of clarity surrounding the timeline and the specific circumstances surrounding Cele’s actions further complicates the situation. It is imperative that an independent body conducts a comprehensive review of the evidence, including witness statements and any available video footage, to determine exactly what transpired.

The outcome of this investigation will undoubtedly have significant implications for public trust in the police and the future of peaceful demonstrations in South Africa.

professorX feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com