Understanding the NCIC: The glue that hold the nation together

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:107%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Bishop Dr Kepha Nyamweya Omae, Chairperson, National Cohesion and Integration Commission. /COURTERSY

There is a persistent misunderstanding in Kenya about the mandate of the National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC).

Kenyans, remember the Commission mainly when it summons a politician over hate speech, issues a statement after an ethnic clash, or its activities during an election period. That perception is dangerously incomplete.

The NCIC is not a ceremonial institution created to issue press statements when Kenyans fight. Neither is it an institution whose relevance begins and ends with elections. It is a statutory institution established to address one of Kenya’s most enduring national challenges: how a deeply diverse society can live together peacefully, equitably and with a shared sense of belonging.

The National Cohesion and Integration Act 2008 gives the Commission a much broader mandate. Its central purpose is to facilitate and promote equality of opportunity, good relations, harmony and peaceful coexistence among Kenya’s different ethnic and racial communities, while advising Gthe governmenton these matters. That is not a peripheral responsibility. It is a national security responsibility, a governance responsibility and a development responsibility.

The NCIC is a product of Kenya’s history. The Commission did not emerge from nowhere. Its creation followed the painful experience of the 2007/08 post-election crisis and the National Accord process. It was established in recognition that Kenya’s ethnic divisions, political competition, discrimination and historical grievances could become catastrophic when left unmanaged. Nearly two decades later, the fundamental challenge has not disappeared.

Kenya remains a country of extraordinary cultural, ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity. Diversity itself is not the problem. Indeed, diversity is one of Kenya’s greatest assets.

The danger arises when political competition, inequality, exclusion, historical grievances, misinformation, hate speech, competition over land and resources, youth unemployment, organised violence and ethnic mobilisation turn diversity into a source of fear and conflict.

This is precisely where the NCIC becomes indispensable. The NCIC is much more than an “anti-hate-speech” commission. Hate speech enforcement is important, but it represents only one part of the Commission’s mandate.

The law empowers NCIC to investigate ethnic and racial discrimination; investigate issues affecting ethnic relations; undertake research; identify factors that inhibit harmonious relations; promote tolerance and acceptance of diversity; facilitate mediation, conciliation and arbitration; advise the government on policies affecting ethnic relations; advocate for legal and administrative reforms; and monitor the implementation of its recommendations.

In other words, NCIC is designed to work before, during and after conflict. We identify emerging risks before they escalate into violence, help communities resolve disputes before they become entrenched, and identify the structural inequalities that create resentment and fuel conflict. This makes the NCIC fundamentally a preventive institution, an institution designed not merely to respond to conflict after it has erupted, but to anticipate, prevent and address the conditions that make violence possible.

When conflict erupts, the State mobilises police, security agencies, administrators, humanitarian actors and sometimes the military. Businesses close. Schools are disrupted. People are displaced. Property is destroyed. Markets collapse. Investors become cautious. Communities become suspicious of one another. The financial cost is enormous, the social cost is even greater. Trust takes years to build and minutes to destroy.

A country that repeatedly waits for conflict to become violent before acting will inevitably spend more on security, humanitarian response, reconstruction and reconciliation than it would have spent on prevention. This is why NCIC should not be viewed simply as another Government institution competing for scarce public resources. It is part of Kenya’s national conflict-prevention infrastructure.

There is also a tendency to regard national cohesion as something soft, abstract or ceremonial. It is not. A cohesive society creates the conditions for economic activity, investment, innovation and development. Where citizens believe that public institutions treat communities fairly, they are more likely to trust Government. Where communities can resolve disputes peacefully, businesses can operate. Where citizens do not fear ethnic exclusion, they participate more confidently in national life. Conversely, discrimination, ethnic exclusion and recurring conflict create economic inefficiencies and deepen poverty.

The NCIC Act therefore explicitly requires the Commission to examine barriers preventing ethnic communities from participating fully in social, economic, cultural and political life and to advise Government on how those barriers can be overcome.

Over the years, the NCIC has played an important preventive role in strengthening Kenya’s social cohesion. Through its monitoring, analysis and engagement, the Commission has been able to identify political rhetoric and public narratives that risk ethnicising political discourse and heightening tensions. Our ethnic and diversity audit of public institutions has exposed patterns of discrimination in access job opportunities, bringing attention to inequalities that can undermine trust in institutions and fuel feelings of exclusion. The ethnic audits are not just about numbers, they are about fairness, representation and accountability.

Through its assessments and engagements with communities, the Commission has identified communities and groups that feel systematically excluded from development and public decision-making, providing an important basis for targeted interventions and policy responses. Perhaps most importantly, the NCIC has consistently brought political, religious, business and community leaders together to create spaces for dialogue and resolve disputes amicably.

As Kenya approaches another highly competitive electoral cycle, the importance of national cohesion cannot be overstated. While elections do not create conflicts it can activate unresolved grievances, sharpen ethnic identities, accelerate hate speech and create incentives for political actors to mobilise communities against one another. The lesson of Kenya’s history is clear: ethnic mobilisation and political competition can become dangerous when institutional safeguards and responsible leadership fail.

NCIC therefore has an essential role to play before, during and after elections, not as an electoral management body, and not as a security agency, but as the institution mandated to protect and strengthen the social relationships upon which peaceful elections ultimately depend.

Government should provide NCIC with adequate resources to discharge its statutory mandate. Parliament should ensure that its budget reflects the national importance of its functions. Government agencies should cooperate with its investigations and recommendations. County governments should work with the Commission on local cohesion challenges.

The public also has an important responsibility, and Kenyans should equally reconsider what they expect from NCIC. The Commission cannot create national cohesion on its own, nor can it substitute for political leadership or assume responsibilities that properly belong to other institutions. It cannot police every social media account and resolve every dispute.

NCIC can provide leadership, coordination, early warning, dialogue, mediation and advocacy, but lasting national cohesion requires the collective commitment and action of citizens, political leaders, communities, civil society, the private sector, the media and all institutions of government. National cohesion is therefore not the responsibility of NCIC alone; it is a whole-of-society responsibility.

The success of the Commission should never be measured simply by the number of politicians summoned, investigated or prosecuted. Those figures may attract headlines, but they do not tell the full story of whether the Commission is fulfilling its preventive mandate.

The Commission should be judged by the conflicts it has prevented before they erupt into violence, the disputes it mediated before they became entrenched, the communities it helped reconcile, the harmful narratives it disrupted and the policies it influenced. In the business of peace, sometimes the greatest achievement is the crisis that never happens.

Much of this work is invisible. It rarely makes the front pages. Indeed, when prevention works, the defining outcome is often that nothing happens. A community does not mobilise for violence. A political dispute does not become an ethnic confrontation. A dangerous narrative does not become a mobilisation tool. A grievance is resolved before it becomes a crisis. That is the paradox of prevention: success is often measured by the violence that never occurred.

This is why Kenyans must understand NCIC for what it is, not as another government bureaucracy, but as a critical part of Kenya’s national architecture for preventing violence, managing conflict, confronting discrimination and building a peaceful, equitable and united society.

Kenya has already paid an enormous price for ethnic division and political violence. If we are serious about protecting Kenya’s peace, strengthening its democracy and securing its future, then investing in national cohesion and in NCIC as one of the institutions entrusted with that responsibility is not optional. It is a national imperative.

The writer is the Chairperson of the National Cohesion and Integration Commission.