Former Bellingham First Responders’ COVID Vaccine Mandate Case Ends as Supreme Court Declines to Hear It

Sentara Leaves Anthem Medicare Advantage Network January 1, So Hampton Roads Members Should Compare Plans Starting October 15Sentara will be out of network for Anthem Medicare Advantage on Jan. 1. Hampton Roads members can check doctors and switch plans by Dec. 7. UnitedHealthcare Will Leave Georgia’s ACA Marketplace in 2027 After State Regulators Pushed Back on a 54% Rate RequestUnitedHealthcare is leaving Georgia Access for 2027 after the state objected to a 54% rate hike. How enrollees can switch plans starting Nov. 1. Freddie Jackson Dies at 70 Two Years After Revealing Kidney Disease, and No Cause Has Been ReleasedR&B singer Freddie Jackson has died at 70, two years after sharing a kidney disease diagnosis. No cause has been released. Who should get tested? Trinity Health Swings to 1.1% Operating Margin on $26.8 Billion Revenue as 557 Michigan IT Jobs Are CutTrinity Health posted a 1.1% operating margin on $26.8 billion in FY2026 while cutting 557 IT jobs and shifting hospital assets. What patients should know. Mental Health A Strong Smell Could Set Off His Sneezing Fits, but His Muscles Told a Stranger StoryStrong smells set off a teacher’s sneeze-like fits for nine years. Muscle recordings showed rapid jerks unlike a textbook sneeze reflex. Louisiana Finds New Synthetic Opioid Cychlorphine in at Least Two Deaths, Warns Extra Naloxone Doses May Be NeededLouisiana found cychlorphine in at least two overdose deaths since December 2025. See where the opioid has spread and why naloxone may need repeating. Utah Links Four Deaths to Opioid-Like Kratom Chemicals Found in Products Labeled Cat’s Claw and Kratom SupplementsUtah ties four deaths to MGPI and MGM-15, kratom-derived opioids found in products labeled cat’s claw. Here’s what buyers should check now. His Wife Says Decades of Sleep Talking Nearly Went Quiet After Hypnosis Gave Her a One-Word CueA man’s decades-long sleep talking faded after hypnosis gave his wife a librarian’s “Shhhh” as a cue, a case report says. Here’s what it shows. Innovation Kennedy Opens NIH Clinic to Study Suspected Vaccine Injuries, but Budget, Enrollment Rules and Oversight Remain UndisclosedKennedy opened an NIH clinic to study suspected vaccine injuries. Its budget, enrollment rules, and oversight have not been made public. Second-Eye Optic Nerve Strokes Came Sooner in GLP-1 Users, but Higher Blood Sugar May Explain the GapGLP-1 users with NAION in both eyes more often had the second eye affected within six months. Higher blood sugar may explain the gap. Every Face She Saw Had Its Eyes Merged at the Center, and a Clot in Her Brain’s Veins Was Behind ItA brain clot made the eyes on every face, even her own, look merged at the center. Her symmetrical distortion and two-day recovery stand out. A Suspected Sarcoma Behind an 80-Year-Old’s Knee Was Actually a Ballooned Artery, Caught Just Before BiopsyAn MRI suggested sarcoma behind an 80-year-old man’s knee. A Doppler scan before biopsy revealed a clot-filled artery aneurysm instead. Healthy Living A Teen’s Arm Kept Turning Bright Blue, and the Clue Doctors Needed Was Growing on Her SkinA 17-year-old’s elbow and arm kept turning bright blue. Heart checks and scans were normal, but a bacterial culture finally explained the color. Bananas, Bread and Tuna Turned a Baby’s Face Red on Both Sides, and Allergy Was Not the CulpritA Japanese baby’s temples and eyelids turned red within minutes of eating many foods. Skin tests were negative. The cause was Frey syndrome. Grace Chicken Vienna Sausages Illegally Imported From Jamaica Reached Stores in Florida, Texas and Three Other StatesUSDA warns Grace chicken Vienna sausages illegally imported from Jamaica reached stores in five states. No illnesses reported. How to check cans. A Cheese-Filled Fish Cake Lodged in a 79-Year-Old’s Airway, and Doctors Froze It to Pull It FreeA Japanese man, 79, inhaled a cheese-filled fish cake at lunch and went into respiratory failure. Doctors used a freezing probe to remove it. Covid – 19 FDA Proposes Requiring Companies to Report Food Additives That Now Reach Grocery Shelves Without Federal ReviewFDA has released its proposed GRAS rule requiring companies to notify the agency about food additives. Here is what the proposal does and does not do. Federal Regulators Warn Some Hair Dryer Brushes Lack the Part That Stops ElectrocutionCPSC warns hair dryer brushes sold on Walmart.com and TikTok Shop lack immersion protection. The seller has not agreed to a recall or refund. A Recalled Teething Toy Broke the Pattern Parents Were Told to Look ForA newly recalled pull-string teething toy has a different model number and design from earlier recalls, and one choking incident has been reported. Trying to Lower Blood Sugar, Cholesterol or Blood Pressure? Different Workouts Suited Different MarkersA pooled analysis of 53 trials found that different exercise types helped different metabolic markers. Most of the evidence was low certainty. Mario Tama | Getty Images Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Pocket The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 5 declined to hear a challenge by former Bellingham, Washington, first responders and city workers who lost their jobs after refusing the city’s 2021 COVID-19 vaccine requirement. The decision leaves in place rulings by two lower federal courts that dismissed their lawsuit.

The case, Brock v. City of Bellingham, appeared on the Court’s order list among petitions denied without comment. No justice noted a dissent. For the 18 former employees who brought the petition, the denial likely ends their federal case. The petition was filed Aug. 24, considered at the justices’ Sept. 28 private conference, and denied a week later.

The petitioners included former police officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, an inspector, and a wastewater supervisor, according to Cascadia Daily News. The original lawsuit, filed in 2024 against the city and former Mayor Seth Fleetwood, challenged an executive order issued in September 2021 that required city employees to be vaccinated.

The lawsuit argued that the 14th Amendment protects a right to refuse “investigational” or “new” drugs. It also claimed violations of due process, equal protection, and privacy, along with wrongful termination. The case did not raise a religious freedom claim.

The petition argued that lower courts “failed to address whether the 14th Amendment precludes states and their political subdivisions from mandating the administration of ‘new drugs,'” The Spokesman-Review reported. Attorney David Schexnaydre earlier said his clients were “forced to choose between a rock and a whirlpool.”

In January 2025, U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein dismissed all claims. She noted that the FDA had fully approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine on Aug. 23, 2021, before the mandate took effect, so the vaccine was not investigational. She also found that federal emergency-use and PREP Act provisions do not give individuals a right to sue under civil rights law, and that the mandate did not implicate a fundamental right, according to the district court ruling.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed in May 2026 in an unpublished decision. “We have already concluded that substantially similar mandates, which were imposed for substantially similar reasons, survive rational basis review,” the three-judge panel wrote in its memorandum.

The city waived its right to respond to the petition. No public statement from the city or the plaintiffs’ attorney on the denial was available in the reporting reviewed by MedicalDaily.

A refusal to hear a case does not mean the Supreme Court agreed with the lower courts. According to the Court’s own guidance, a denial “signifies only that the Court has chosen not to accept the case for review and does not express the Court’s view of the merits of the case.” The Court hears arguments in only about 1% of cases filed each term.

Because the denial sets no national precedent, its legal effect is limited to this case, and other courts remain free to reach their own conclusions. The Ninth Circuit’s decision was also unpublished, which means it does not bind future cases in that circuit, though it reflects how the court has treated similar mandates.

The outcome fits a broader pattern. Courts have largely upheld workplace and school vaccine requirements under long-standing precedent. In September, the justices also turned away an emergency request from a New York mother seeking a religious exemption for her kindergartner.

The Bellingham case stems from a 2021 mandate. The denial does not create new rules for current workers, and it does not affect vaccine availability.

For workers, the main lesson is practical. Employer vaccine policies, especially for health care and public safety jobs, often depend on state law, union contracts, and whether medical or religious accommodations are offered. Workers with concerns can review their employer’s written policy, ask about accommodation procedures, and keep copies of any requests.

People with medical concerns about a vaccine should discuss them with a clinician, who can review their health history and any documented reactions. Possible vaccine injuries can be reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

The Bellingham workers’ federal case is over, but the denial decides nothing beyond their case, and the debate over mandates and exemptions continues in other courts.

What did the Supreme Court decide? On Oct. 5, it declined to hear Brock v. City of Bellingham, leaving lower court dismissals in place. No justice noted a dissent.

Who brought the case? Eighteen former Bellingham employees, including police officers, firefighters, and EMTs, who lost their jobs after refusing the 2021 mandate, petitioned the Court.

What did the workers argue? They argued the 14th Amendment protects a right to refuse new or investigational drugs and claimed due process and equal protection violations.

Does the denial set a national precedent? No. A denial does not express the Court’s view on the merits and does not bind other courts.

Does this affect vaccine rules today? Not directly. The decision creates no new rules for current workers and does not affect vaccine availability.