Trump says Super Pac will pay for taxpayer-funded ads that sparked outcry
The pro-Trump ads were described by Democrats as âdesperate pre-election propagandaâ. Photograph: White HouseView image in fullscreenThe pro-Trump ads were described by Democrats as âdesperate pre-election propagandaâ. Photograph: White HouseTrump says Super Pac will pay for taxpayer-funded ads that sparked outcryPresidentâs U-turn comes after Democrats and Republicans condemned use of tax dollars for pro-Trump ads
In a social media post, Trump characterized the ads, which cost at least $1.5m in federal funds, as âa positive promotion for our Great U.S.A.â and called them âa rather standard thing to doâ.
Maga Inc is Trumpâs political war chest, which had amassed more than $400m by the end of July. Trump has begun to tap it to boost Republican candidates across the US ahead of midterm elections.
Trump provided no details on reimbursing taxpayers for ads that already aired, nor how he would go about having his political organization pay for such advertising.
The White House â which had fiercely defended using taxpayer money on spots meant to promote the president â said Monday night Maga Inc would pay for such ads in the future. It did not answer questions on how it or Trump might prove that his political funds were being used on any ads.
Trumpâs abrupt about-face came after leaders from both parties criticized using taxpayer funds.
Last week, two congressional Democrats asked federal watchdogs to investigate whether the Trump administration illegally used taxpayer money to air the television spots that began airing in late September.
Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House judiciary committee, and California congressman George Whitesides wrote to the government accountability office (GAO) and the office of special counsel (OSC), describing the commercials as âdesperate pre-election propagandaâ.
Legal experts said the ads might even violate federal statutes, including a law against congressionally appropriated funds being used for âpublicity or propagandaâ and one limiting the partisan political activities of government employees.
The first ad featured clips of Trump talking about defeating communism interspersed with onscreen text promoting the âlargest tax cuts in historyâ, âreigniting American manufacturingâ and a call to âdefend law and order and policeâ.
Later the same week, a second ad began running. It showed scenic videos of Mount Rushmore with quotes and clips from Trumpâs Fourth of July weekend speech there honoring the countryâs 250th anniversary.
A third, more recent one was virtually identical to an ad for Trumpâs Republican reelection campaign in 2024 and showed him walking down a hallway as his voice can be heard warning of a âfinal battleâ against âglobalistsâ and âwarmongersâ.
All ended with a message: âPaid for by the US government.â
According to AdImpact, which tracks media spending, the spots had cost at least $1.4m by the end of September. The actual amount spent could be far more, depending on whether networks classified the ad as a political ad.
Reported by theguardian.com.
Read Original Report at theguardian.com â
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your opinion!