Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi Fires Back at Julius Malema

Former Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) spokesperson Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi has replied sharply to EFF President Julius Malema after Malema criticised his decision not to vote in the 2026 Local Government Elections. The exchange has brought the tension between the two political figures back into public view.

Malema had questioned why Ndlozi chose to stay away from the polls. He suggested that skipping an election was not normal and did not match what is expected of politically aware people. Ndlozi did not accept this. He made it clear that he would not simply take Malema’s view without challenging the issues he believes deserve more attention.

Ndlozi’s reply moved the discussion beyond his personal choice. Instead of letting the debate stay on his decision to abstain, he turned attention to the EFF’s election performance and the direction of the party. He questioned the wider political arguments being made by the party’s leadership.

The timing makes the exchange more significant. The 2026 local government elections were another major test for South Africa’s political parties, and the results have sparked talk about voter confidence, party leadership and whether opposition parties can hold on to their support. For the EFF, this matters a great deal, because Malema has long presented the party as a major force in national politics, and its results are seen as a measure of its strength.

Ndlozi’s criticism raises a basic question. Should party leaders spend their energy on those who choose not to vote, or on understanding why voters are becoming unhappy? Malema, for his part, has held firmly to the view that voting and taking part in politics are important, and he has made Ndlozi’s decision a subject of public criticism.

The disagreement also touches on the tension between loyalty to a party, personal freedom and accountability in opposition politics. Malema believes citizens, and especially influential figures, should vote. Ndlozi’s response suggests that criticism of abstaining should not push aside wider questions about leadership and results.

The phrase “go argue with the wall” has been linked to Ndlozi’s dismissive replies to critics in earlier exchanges, and its use in the headline of this latest clash has added to public interest.

It is not yet clear whether the argument will continue in public or fade away. For now, it has reopened conversations about the EFF’s direction, Malema’s leadership and Ndlozi’s place in the country’s political debate.

The full text of Ndlozi’s latest response was not available in the sources used for this report, so his words are not quoted here.

Source: https://x.com/MzansiFarmer/status/2119388033426329825?a=IPH6SM4A6Af5O6fWjRA&s=19

If you liked this story, please follow or tip the author to help them write more!

RushHour_News feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com