Matlala Leaves Madlanga Commission Stunned After Giving Unexpected Explanation About General Sibiya

According to proceedings at the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry on Monday, November 9, businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala gave a surprising explanation when questioned about how information concerning suspended police General Shadrack Sibiya reached investigators examining allegations of corruption within the South African Police Service (SAPS).

The exchange began when Commissioner Khumalo sought to establish whether Matlala had independently approached the commission’s investigators with information about Sibiya. The question focused on the circumstances surrounding his earlier disclosures and whether he had willingly shared details about the senior police official.

“Did you volunteer information (to the Commission’s investigators) about General Sibiya?” Commissioner Khumalo asked.

Matlala’s response introduced another dimension to the questioning, as he suggested that his condition at the time might have affected what he disclosed. He replied: “Maybe I was drunk… I was heavily under psychiatric treatment.”

His answer has drawn attention to the reliability and circumstances of statements previously made by the businessman, whose relationship with senior police figures is being examined by the commission.

The inquiry is also considering Matlala’s earlier testimony before Parliament’s ad hoc committee investigating allegations of criminality within the police service. His statements about Sibiya have become particularly important because of questions surrounding the nature of their alleged relationship.

Earlier on November 9, Matlala told the commission that his previous account to the parliamentary committee had allegedly been influenced by threats communicated through his former attorney. According to his testimony, he feared that disclosing the full details of his dealings with Sibiya could expose members of his family to danger.

Those allegations were reported by the Mail & Guardian and have added another issue for investigators to consider when assessing the businessman’s previous statements.

The commission must now examine the different accounts provided by Matlala, the circumstances in which information was disclosed and whether his claims can be supported by other evidence.

Sibiya’s suspension and the allegations surrounding his dealings with Matlala have placed their association under increased scrutiny. However, the questions raised during the proceedings remain matters for investigation rather than established findings.

The latest testimony therefore represents another important development in the inquiry, particularly as commissioners seek clarity about Matlala’s disclosures, his previous claims and the possible involvement of senior police officials.

https://x.com/xolimngambi/status/2119822935481274553?s=46

Bolu911 feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com