Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi Has Hit Back At Malema After Criticizing Him For Not Voting, See What He Says

Former Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) Member of Parliament Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi has hit back at party leader Julius Malema, questioning his leadership following the party’s disappointing performance in the 2026 Local Government Elections.

Ndlozi’s latest remarks come after Malema took a swipe at him over his decision not to participate in the recent local government elections, reportedly dismissing him as one of the “boys” amid their ongoing public fallout.

In response, Ndlozi took to X, where he defended his decision to abstain from voting, describing it as a deliberate choice and arguing that the Constitution protects the right of citizens to decide whether or not to participate in elections.

He maintained that voting should not be treated as a compulsory obligation and insisted that political parties must work to earn the support of voters rather than assume that citizens owe them their votes.

However, Ndlozi did not stop at defending his decision. He turned the spotlight on the EFF’s electoral performance, challenging Malema to account for the party’s declining support and what he believes reflects deeper problems within its leadership.

“In the end, the writing is on the wall – properly displayed in percentages,” Ndlozi wrote.

He questioned how the EFF had lost almost half of its previous vote share, effectively putting pressure on Malema to explain the factors behind the party’s electoral decline.

His comments have added another dimension to the public disagreement between the two former political allies, whose relationship has increasingly become a subject of political discussion.

Ndlozi’s criticism also raises questions about the EFF’s ability to maintain its influence in South African politics, particularly as voters reassess their confidence in established political parties.

While Malema has previously criticised Ndlozi’s political positions, the former MP’s latest response suggests that he is unwilling to remain silent as the EFF leadership faces scrutiny over its electoral performance.

The exchange has further intensified the political tension surrounding the EFF, with the party now facing questions not only from its political opponents but also from former members who once played significant roles in its political journey.

Ultimately, the disagreement highlights a growing debate about political accountability, voter confidence and whether party leaders should take responsibility when electoral support declines.

Source: https://x.com/MDNnewss/status/2119854158735925501?s=19