Big Claim About Haruna Iddrisu Emerges as Aide Invokes Late Aliu Mahama’s Name

A bold claim about Haruna Iddrisu’s standing in Dagbon has brought attention to the Education Minister’s influence in the northern part of Ghana. An aide has reportedly compared his influence in the traditional area only to that of the late former Vice-President Alhaji Aliu Mahama, a statement that is likely to attract interest in Ghana’s political circles.

The claim is significant because Dagbon has a strong place in Ghana’s traditional and political life. Statements about who holds influence in the area can easily lead to discussions about leadership, public service, political connections and the role prominent figures play in their communities.

According to a report published by MyNewsGH on Thursday, October 29, 2026, an aide to Haruna Iddrisu made the comparison between the minister and the late Aliu Mahama. However, the available report excerpt does not identify the aide or provide the full statement explaining the basis for the comparison.

That gap matters because influence can mean different things. It may refer to a person’s relationship with traditional leaders, their standing among residents, their political support or their contribution to development. Without further details, it is difficult to determine precisely what the aide meant.

Haruna Iddrisu is a well-known figure in Ghanaian politics, having held senior positions in government and Parliament. His political career has made him an important name in discussions about leadership and representation, particularly in the northern part of the country.

The late Alhaji Aliu Mahama, Ghana’s former Vice-President, also held a prominent place in the country’s political history. His years in public office gave him national recognition, and his name continues to carry weight in discussions about northern Ghana and its role in national affairs.

Comparing Iddrisu to a figure of Aliu Mahama’s standing is therefore a strong statement. It places the minister among personalities whose influence is considered significant by those making the comparison. However, the claim remains the view attributed to the aide and should not be treated as an established fact about the opinions of all Dagbon residents.

It would also be wrong to assume that traditional leaders or the people of Dagbon share the same assessment without evidence. Communities are made up of people with different views, interests and political choices.

The comparison raises an important question: how should political influence be measured? Is it through public office, support from the community, personal relationships or the lasting impact of a person’s work? Different people may judge these factors differently.