“My Former Lawyer Told Me Sibiya Will Kill My My Entire Family If He Revealed The Truth” Matlala Say

Businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala has made serious allegations against his former lawyer, Forbay, claiming he was discouraged from revealing the full details of his alleged relationship with suspended South African Police Service deputy national commissioner Shadrack Sibiya during his testimony before Parliament’s Ad Hoc Committee.

According to an affidavit, Matlala alleges that Forbay warned him against disclosing everything he knew about his dealings with Sibiya. He claims his former legal representative suggested that revealing the full truth could put his family members at risk.

Matlala further alleges that Forbay told him Sibiya would kill his entire family if he disclosed the details of their relationship during the parliamentary proceedings. The businessman’s claims have raised questions about the circumstances surrounding his testimony and whether he faced pressure to withhold certain information.

In the affidavit, Matlala also alleges that Forbay communicated with Sibiya during breaks in the committee proceedings. He claims the two allegedly discussed how he should respond to questions from members of Parliament.

If evidence emerges to support these allegations, the matter could raise concerns about the independence of Matlala’s testimony and whether external parties attempted to influence the information presented to the committee.

The accusations have also drawn renewed attention to the alleged relationship between Matlala and Sibiya, who remains suspended from his position as deputy national commissioner of the police.

Matlala’s account suggests that he believes his former lawyer attempted to discourage him from providing a complete explanation of his dealings with the senior police official. However, the nature of the alleged communications and their potential impact on his testimony remain unclear.

It is important to note that the allegations against Forbay and the reported threat attributed to Sibiya have not been independently verified. The claims do not, on their own, establish that Sibiya threatened Matlala’s family or that Forbay deliberately attempted to influence his testimony.

Responses from both Forbay and Sibiya would be necessary to clarify their positions and address the accusations. Any additional evidence relating to the alleged conversations could also help establish what transpired during the parliamentary proceedings.

The matter could have broader implications for public confidence in Parliament’s inquiry if further evidence emerges suggesting that witnesses were pressured or their testimony influenced.

For now, the allegations remain unverified, and the individuals mentioned should be given an opportunity to respond before any conclusions are reached about their alleged involvement.

https://x.com/TheTruthPanther/status/2115105395500834915

Oyass1990 feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com