EUGENE DE KOCK SHOCKS SOUTH AFRICA: “Strip De Klerk of His Nobel Peace Prize

EUGENE DE KOCK BOMBSHELL! EX-APARTHEID COP DEMANDS REVOCATION OF FW DE KLERK’S NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA — 26 October 2026

Former apartheid-era police officer Eugene de Kock has reignited debate over accountability for crimes committed during apartheid after calling for former South African president FW de Klerk’s Nobel Peace Prize to be revoked.

De Kock made the remarks while appearing before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Inquiry, where he questioned why he was prosecuted for apartheid-era crimes while senior political and security figures allegedly escaped similar consequences.

The former security police operative argued that he had been made a scapegoat for a broader system of violence, insisting that accountability should not have stopped with individuals who carried out crimes on the ground.

De Kock reportedly described De Klerk as “a killer who was never convicted”, challenging the former president’s record and the international recognition he received for his role in South Africa’s transition to democracy.

De Kock’s criticism centred on De Klerk’s claim, reportedly published in the Sunday Times, that he had no blood on his hands. The former police officer challenged that position by pointing to decisions made during the apartheid era that he alleged contributed to deadly violence, including the deaths of children.

He also raised questions about the role of former police commissioner General George Meiring and the appointment of officials who were involved in, or responsible for, policing operations during the period.

His comments place renewed attention on the chain of command within the apartheid security establishment and whether political leaders and senior officers were sufficiently investigated for abuses committed under their authority.

However, De Kock’s allegations remain his own claims and should not be treated as proof of individual criminal responsibility. Any determination of criminal liability would require appropriate legal evidence and proceedings.

De Kock further claimed that he would have testified against apartheid-era generals had they faced criminal charges. He argued that the prosecution of lower-ranking operatives, without comparable scrutiny of senior figures, represented a failure to deliver comprehensive justice.

His remarks revive longstanding questions about the relationship between the TRC process, criminal prosecutions and the political compromises that accompanied South Africa’s transition from apartheid to democracy.

De Klerk, who served as South Africa’s last apartheid-era president, shared the 1993 Nobel Peace Prize with Nelson Mandela for their efforts to bring apartheid to an end and establish the foundations for democratic transition.

The award remains an important part of South Africa’s history, although De Kock’s latest intervention challenges how responsibility for apartheid-era abuses should be understood.

Ultimately, his testimony highlights the continuing demand for answers from victims and families seeking accountability for past atrocities. Whether his allegations lead to further legal scrutiny remains uncertain, but the questions he has raised continue to fuel debate over justice, reconciliation and the legacy of apartheid.

Source https://x.com/TheTruthPanther/status/2114679528404492359

SA-King feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com