SAFA In Shambles: Millions In Rage as SAFA Quietly Spends Fortune to Save Danny Jordaan From Prison

SAFA Makes Major Decision to Pay Danny Jordaan’s Legal Bills as R1.3 Million Criminal Case Continues

The South African Football Association (SAFA) has taken a significant decision that is likely to intensify debate around accountability and leadership in South African football after its National Executive Committee (NEC) resolved to cover the legal costs of president Dr Danny Jordaan and chief financial officer Gronie Hluyo in their ongoing criminal case.

The decision means SAFA will pay the legal expenses incurred by both officials, including costs already accumulated during the proceedings. The move comes as Jordaan and Hluyo continue to face allegations of fraud, theft and conspiracy to commit fraud involving more than R1.3 million in association funds.

The allegations relate to the alleged use of SAFA money between 2014 and 2018 for Jordaan’s personal security and public relations services. Both officials were arrested in 2024 following an investigation by the Hawks, South Africa’s Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation.

However, SAFA’s leadership has maintained that the association itself was not responsible for initiating the criminal complaint against the officials. The organisation has argued that the complainants were disgruntled former NEC members and employees acting in their personal capacities.

SAFA chief executive officer Lydia Monyepao reportedly told the court in December 2024 that the association had not lodged a complaint with either the South African Police Service or the Hawks.

In addition to covering the legal expenses, the NEC has resolved to submit a written statement to the court disputing allegations of wrongdoing against the association. SAFA also intends to appoint an attorney and Senior Counsel to monitor the proceedings through a watching brief.

The association has further indicated that it intends to pursue civil action against individuals it believes have brought SAFA into disrepute. It has also highlighted the unqualified audit opinions received during the period under investigation as part of its position.

Nevertheless, the decision to fund the defence of senior officials facing criminal charges raises important questions about institutional responsibility, the use of football association resources and the distinction between defending an organisation’s interests and supporting individual office-bearers.

The criminal case remains in the pre-trial phase, with the defence challenging the legality of the search-and-seizure operation conducted at SAFA House in 2024. A possible trial date of 27 November has been indicated, although the proceedings remain subject to developments in court.

For now, Jordaan and Hluyo remain entitled to the presumption of innocence, and the allegations against them have not been proven in court.

SAFA’s decision has placed the spotlight firmly on its leadership, with supporters and observers likely to scrutinise how the association balances its duty to protect its officials with its responsibility to safeguard football’s credibility and public trust.

Source https://x.com/KickOffMagazine/status/2113183727413084666

SA_Sports feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com