Now, You Are 69. By the Time You Are Inaugurated in 2029, You Will Be 72. What Have We Done – A Plus

In an Official Facebook Post on 22 October, 2026, A Plus launched a scathing attack on a veteran Ghanaian politician believed to be nursing presidential ambitions, questioning both his age and political record. He stated, “Now, you are 69. By the time you are inaugurated in 2029, you will be 72. What have we done to deserve this?” while arguing that Ghanaians should be cautious about entrusting the presidency to leaders whose political careers span decades without what he considers significant developmental achievements.

According to A Plus, the politician in question has been active in Ghanaian politics for many years and has held influence within a region blessed with abundant natural resources, including gold, timber, and fertile agricultural land. Despite these advantages, he argued that many communities within the region continue to face developmental challenges such as inadequate sanitation, poverty, and limited economic opportunities.

The outspoken commentator questioned the basis upon which the politician seeks the highest office in the land, suggesting that citizens should assess aspirants based on their track records rather than political longevity. In his view, occupying positions of influence over several decades should translate into visible improvements in the living conditions of the people.

A Plus also drew comparisons with Ghana’s recent political history, referencing concerns that have occasionally been raised regarding the age of national leaders. He argued that Ghanaians only recently emerged from an era in which an elderly president completed his tenure, and therefore voters should carefully consider whether they wish to repeat a similar experience in the years ahead.

The social commentator expressed concern that age alone should not be the determining factor in leadership selection, but maintained that questions about energy, innovation, vision, and future-oriented leadership inevitably arise whenever older political figures seek to extend their careers through presidential ambitions.

Beyond age, A Plus raised issues relating to accountability and governance. He questioned whether the country could be assured of a different outcome should another long-serving political figure assume office. According to him, voters should be interested in concrete plans, measurable achievements, and leadership capacity rather than relying solely on political experience.

The Facebook post also contained strong criticisms directed at the politician’s supporters. A Plus defended his right to express controversial opinions and argued that public figures should be prepared to face criticism and scrutiny. He maintained that political commentary is an essential part of democratic discourse and that disagreements should be expected whenever major national issues are discussed.

His remarks have since generated reactions across social media, with supporters and critics weighing in on the issues raised. While some users agreed that political leadership should increasingly focus on younger generations and fresh ideas, others argued that age should not automatically disqualify individuals from seeking public office, especially if they possess the experience and competence required for leadership.

Political analysts note that conversations about age, leadership succession, and generational change are becoming increasingly common in many democracies around the world. In Ghana, such debates often intensify whenever discussions about future presidential candidates emerge.

As the country gradually turns its attention toward the next electoral cycle, comments such as those made by A Plus are likely to fuel broader discussions about leadership, accountability, political experience, and the qualities voters expect from individuals seeking the nation’s highest office.

Source: A Plus, Official Facebook Post, 22 October, 2026