Alan Are You Serious? —Nation quizzes as he says NPP making him flagbearer is the only condition

In an official Facebook post shared on 22 October 2026, political commentary platform Nation Watch delivered an unsparing, highly critical reaction to recent declarations made by Alan Kwadwo Kyerematen. The commentary responds directly to Kyerematen’s public statement that he would only be willing to return to the New Patriotic Party (NPP) on the strict condition that he is invited back specifically to lead the party as its flagbearer.

The core of the commentary cuts straight to the sense of political entitlement underlying such conditional demands. Nation Watch fiercely rebukes the notion that a major political party’s flagbearership is a vacant throne, a matter of personal succession, or a pre-determined birthright. Highlighting the fundamental mechanics of internal party democracy, the post reminds the public that leadership positions are decided transparently by delegates casting their votes under party rules—not through pre-signed guarantees or ultimatums. Furthermore, the commentary addresses the history of his departure, pointing out that nobody forced him out; rather, he walked away voluntarily when internal contestations did not swing in his favor.

To bring the broader systemic and electoral reality to light, the post challenges the weight of such political posturing against actual electoral performance. Nation Watch questions how a politician who struggled to match the local vote counts of individual parliamentary candidates—such as Ahmed Shaib in Weija—can realistically expect an entire national political structure to hand over its leadership crown without going through the rigors of grassroots competition. The commentary emphasizes that politics is fundamentally built on mobilizing votes and earning the trust of delegates, not on setting arbitrary terms from the outside.

Ultimately, this political brief serves as a sharp reality check for political figures attempting to dictate terms to their former camps. Nation Watch’s blunt intervention concludes with a firm reminder that while political doors remain open, leadership cannot be demanded on a silver platter, advising that the path forward requires humility rather than entitlement.

Do you agree with Nation Watch that political figures who break away from their parties lose the moral standing to demand automatic flagbearership upon return? How should political parties handle former members seeking readmission? Share your thoughts and join the discussion in the comments below!

Source: Nation Watch, Official Facebook Post, 22 October, 2026.