Billionaire widow Mireya Cisneros under fire as daughter battles for father’s fortune

Please enable JavaScript for the best SAMAA TV experience.

Note: For enhanced search features, please enable JavaScript.

Oswaldo Cisneros estate fuels inheritance dispute

A bitter inheritance dispute over the fortune of late Venezuelan billionaire Oswaldo Cisneros has intensified amid claims by government sources that his estate was valued at more than $10 billion and could face an inheritance-tax liability exceeding $3 billion.

The claims have drawn renewed attention to his widow, Mireya Blavia de Cisneros, and a legal battle involving his three daughters from his first marriage. The reported valuation, tax liability and payment status have not been independently verified.

Venezuelan government sources said the country’s tax authority, SENIAT, assessed the estate and was examining potential inheritance and succession-tax obligations. One official claimed there was no record of the reported amount having been paid.

Cisneros’s estate is linked to Digitel, one of Venezuela’s largest mobile telecommunications operators, as well as interests in oil, real estate and other businesses.

Government sources have raised allegations concerning personal and corporate tax liabilities, underinvestment, bribery, political kickbacks and other purported irregularities involving businesses associated with the family.

Mireya has also faced allegations over investment commitments and business dealings during the presidency of Nicolás Maduro. A legal source representing her disputed aspects of the accusations but acknowledged issues involving underinvestment and unfulfilled commitments, attributing some of the problems to US sanctions affecting Venezuela’s financial system.

The allegations have not been established as judicial findings in the material available.

Oswaldo Cisneros died in Miami on November 8, 2020. He had three daughters from his first marriage: Claudia Susana, Maritza Blanca and María Ella Cisneros Fontanals.

He and Mireya had no biological children together but adopted six children in Romania and Colombia: Carmen Elena, Camila Roxana, Alfonso Olaf, Oswaldo Antonio, Laura Gissel and Carla Giovana.

Cisneros’s closed will, registered in Venezuela in December 2017, named Mireya and all nine children as his “sole and universal heirs”.

Lawyers representing the three daughters have challenged aspects of the inheritance arrangements, arguing that the structure disadvantaged them by giving the six adopted children greater collective influence over family interests.

The dispute has also involved allegations that Mireya sought majority control of family trusts and businesses through the adopted children’s voting strength. Venezuelan government sources have made further claims that the adoptions were intended to shift voting power within the family’s business structures.

Those allegations remain unproven in the material available.

A central legal challenge was brought by Claudia Susana Cisneros Fontanals, who described herself as a legitimate, compulsory and testamentary heir.

On May 12, 2021, she challenged the standing of the six adopted children, arguing that foreign adoption judgments had not undergone exequátur — the procedure through which certain foreign judgments are formally recognised in Venezuela.

On August 3, 2021, the Supreme Tribunal’s Social Cassation Chamber ruled that the procedure was required, found the six children lacked standing in the relevant succession proceedings and ordered related proceedings archived.

However, after Mireya sought constitutional review, the Constitutional Chamber annulled that ruling on January 31, 2022. It found that qualifying international adoptions covered by the Hague Convention did not require the additional exequátur procedure.

The decision overturned the attempt to exclude the adopted children on that legal ground, although it did not settle every issue in the inheritance dispute.

In July 2021, a Caracas court admitted a criminal complaint filed by Claudia against Mireya alleging private violence, extortion and association to commit crimes.

Claudia alleged that threats, coercion and other unlawful pressure had been used to compel her to accept acts she was not legally obliged to accept, or to secure a financial advantage at her expense.

The admission of the complaint did not establish guilt, and the available material does not clarify the case’s eventual outcome.

Government sources have also described Mireya as a close ally of Maduro and raised suspicions that she continued lobbying on his behalf. Those claims require independent corroboration.

A legal representative for Mireya said she would continue to contest Claudia’s legal challenges.

Lawyer says PTI chairman suggested only Imran Khan can decide on Achakzai’s replacement

Tremors of 3.7 magnitude recorded at depth of 17km

Violent protests over cost of living, declining public services leave cities devastated, force gathering bans