I Wanted to Say That but for Fear of Contempt – Peter Tawiah on Afenyo‑Markin’s Defective Suit

In an Official Facebook Post by Peter Tawiah on 14 October 2026, the outspoken commentator delivered a blistering reaction to the High Court’s dismissal of Alexander Afenyo‑Markin’s GH₵15 million defamation suit against Sammy Gyamfi. His post, captioned “I WANTED TO SAY THAT BUT FOR FEAR OF CONTEMPT”, was both sarcastic and uncompromising, aimed at exposing what he described as the frivolous nature of the case.

Tawiah argued that “those of us who eat courts daily” knew from the beginning that the suit would be thrown out and “placed in a dust bin.” He described the writ as frivolous, incompetent, useless, and defective, suggesting that it was filed merely as a face‑saving act to halt mounting public pressure. His tone was sharp, mocking Afenyo‑Markin’s repeated boast of being “senior at the Bar,” while failing to file a proper suit capable of sustaining jurisdiction.

The post reflects the theme of legal irony and political accountability. Tawiah’s commentary suggests that the lawsuit was not a genuine attempt to clear Afenyo‑Markin’s name but rather a symbolic gesture that collapsed under scrutiny. By labeling it “defective” and “frivolous,” he underscored the perception that the Majority Leader’s legal maneuver was hollow from the start.

At a deeper level, Tawiah’s remarks highlight the intersection of law, politics, and public perception. In Ghana’s political landscape, courtroom battles often serve as extensions of partisan disputes. When such cases fail procedurally, they not only weaken the litigant’s legal standing but also amplify reputational damage. Tawiah’s rhetorical question “Are you extortionist?” dramatizes the lingering tag that the suit was meant to erase but instead reinforced.

Observers note that Tawiah’s post resonates with broader debates about competence and credibility in leadership. Afenyo‑Markin’s attempt to silence critics through litigation has now backfired, raising questions about whether legal expertise was matched by procedural diligence. Tawiah’s biting comparison of the MP to “Lamine Yamal of Exto…” was a metaphorical flourish, intended to ridicule and dramatize the perceived futility of the suit.

In conclusion, Peter Tawiah’s post “I WANTED TO SAY THAT BUT FOR FEAR OF CONTEMPT” is a satirical reflection on political hubris and legal failure. It dramatizes how attempts to use the courts for reputation management can collapse under procedural incompetence, reminding Ghanaians that credibility is earned through substance, not symbolic gestures.

Source: Peter Tawiah, Official Facebook Post, 14 October 2026

NewsExpress feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com