Times has exposed these Journalist who made us believe they were fighting for Ghana – Afia Saddam

In an Official Facebook Post on 12 October 2026, Afia Saddam launched a stinging criticism of a number of journalists and media personalities whom she accused of presenting themselves as neutral defenders of national interest while allegedly pursuing political objectives. Her comments have generated significant discussion on social media, touching on the highly sensitive relationship between journalism, politics, and public trust.

According to Afia Saddam, many Ghanaians are willing to overlook some of the promises and statements made by political parties during election campaigns because political actors are often expected to engage in rhetoric as part of electoral competition. However, she argued that what citizens should not forget is the role played by some journalists who, in her view, presented themselves as independent voices while allegedly advancing the interests of a particular political tradition.

The post specifically mentioned several well-known media figures, commentators, and broadcasters. Afia Saddam claimed that these individuals convinced sections of the public that they were acting purely in Ghana’s interest, but events after the elections have, in her opinion, exposed their true political loyalties.

Her criticism reflects a broader debate that has existed in Ghana’s media landscape for many years. Questions about media neutrality, political affiliations, and the independence of journalists often emerge during election periods, particularly when journalists take strong positions on national issues. In such situations, supporters of opposing political parties frequently accuse media personalities of acting as covert political actors rather than objective journalists.

Afia Saddam’s comments suggest that the issue goes beyond political parties and extends to those who shape public opinion. In her view, if journalists hold politicians accountable, they must also be willing to face scrutiny from the public regarding their own conduct and perceived political leanings.

Observers note that journalism remains one of the most influential professions in Ghana’s democratic system. Media personalities often play a critical role in exposing corruption, questioning those in authority, and informing citizens about national developments. However, because of that influence, they are frequently subjected to criticism and accusations of bias by political actors and their supporters.

The debate has sparked mixed reactions. Some social media users agree with Afia Saddam’s position, arguing that certain journalists abandoned professional neutrality and openly aligned themselves with political causes while claiming independence. Others strongly disagree, insisting that journalists should not be labeled partisan simply because they were critical of a government or spoke strongly on matters of national concern.

What makes the discussion particularly significant is that it reflects the growing challenge of maintaining public trust in institutions. In a deeply polarized political environment, journalists often find themselves under pressure from both sides of the political divide. Supporters of one political party may accuse a journalist of bias simply because of unfavorable coverage, while supporters of another may make similar accusations from the opposite direction.

At its core, Afia Saddam’s argument is about credibility and accountability. She believes that those who presented themselves as neutral advocates for good governance should also be subjected to public examination, especially when their actions or statements are perceived to align with political interests.

Whether one agrees with her conclusions or not, the post has reignited an important national conversation about political influence, media independence, and the responsibilities that come with shaping public opinion in a democratic society.

Source: Afia Saddam, Official Facebook Post, 12 October, 2026.