Britain has spent £1.1trillion more on welfare than infrastructure, report finds

DAILYMAIL.COM • 1h ago

By LETTICE BROMOVSKY, NEWS REPORTER 00:04 13 Oct 2026, updated 00:04 13 Oct 2026

Britain has spent £1.1trillion more on welfare than infrastructure in the past 20 years, the Centre for Social Justice report found.

The CSJ said welfare had acted as an ‘anaesthetic that has kept areas of the country numbed during two decades of economic failure’.

The think-tank said the UK had spent £1.6 trillion on working-age benefits between 2006/7 and 2024/25, far outstripping public investment in transport, science and technology, economic development, housing and community amenities.

Ben Gregg, head of welfare at the think-tank, said: ‘For decades, governments have tried to compensate struggling regions for economic decline rather than reverse it, using welfare to numb the pain instead of providing a reason to hope.’

Monday’s State of Dependency report found that between 1945 and 1979, the UK had spent around 4.5 per cent of GDP on infrastructure and 2.5 per cent on working-age welfare.

But those proportions had now reversed, with the country spending 5 per cent of GDP on working-age benefits and 2.5 per cent on infrastructure investment.

It added that the lack of investment was particularly acute in areas with high levels of worklessness – including areas of the North, the Midlands and South Wales where economic output per person had barely increased in two decades.

Mr Gregg added: ‘A Britain where everyone has a stake in prosperity is one where good jobs and thriving towns are within reach of every community.

‘That is not achieved by writing a cheque and forgetting about people. It comes from investing in these places and removing the barriers that stop businesses doing the same.’

The report comes as Chancellor John Healey faces pressure from opposition parties to reduce welfare spending at his Budget on October 28.

In his speech at the Labour Party conference last month, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the Government could get the welfare bill down by supporting more people into work.

But he ruled out ‘crude cuts’ to benefits, saying that should ‘never be the Labour way’.

Labour’s new ‘£9bn’ stealth tax raid: Hated freeze on thresholds set to hammer Brits even harder as…

Tiger victim ‘was on all fours, praying and bowing’ to the animal before it mauled him to death at…

Katie Price tells court she confronted ex Kieran Hayler over claims he raped girl, 13, and asked if…

Tiger attack witness reveals victim asked her to take his picture moments before he jumped into the…

Witnesses screamed at man to ‘play dead’ before he was mauled to death by tiger at Yorkshire zoo -…

Saudi Arabia’s terrified Crown Prince MBS ‘is moving between heavily guarded palaces with bunkers as…

Nato chief warns his forces will destroy ‘anything and everything’ if Putin is ‘foolish enough’ to…

Family discover daughter, 15, is alive in her coffin during wake

Harry and Meghan’s new life as ‘private citizens’: Sussexes will make first joint public appearance…

Student carried out a ‘cold-blooded execution’ of university housemate by ‘ambushing him and…

Burnham says Brexit ‘not good enough’ as he vows to cosy up to EU at next month’s summit – as…

Boris Johnson suggests Burnham is LYING about Russian interference in EU referendum – as No10…

‘When everything was falling apart, Carole was the one’: ROBERT JOBSON reveals how Prince William…

Powerful Tropical Storm Rachel batters waterfront properties in California leaving homes crumbling…

Young woman, 21, with her whole life ahead of her went into hospital to treat a broken ankle… just…

British woman is left stranded in Greek hospital with £10,000 medical bill after breaking her back…

Britain has spent £1.1tn more on welfare than infrastructure – reportComments are subject to our House rules and TermsNewest{{#isModerationStatus}}{{moderationStatus}}

No one seems to have shared their thoughts on this topic yetLeave a comment so your voice will be heard first.

{{upVotes}}{{downVotes}}{{#replies.comments}}{{^isLast}}{{initials}}{{userAlias}}, United Kingdom, {{formattedDateAndTime}}{{message}}

{{upVotes}}{{downVotes}}{{/isLast}}{{#isLast}}{{initials}}{{userAlias}}, United Kingdom, {{formattedDateAndTime}}{{message}}

{{upVotes}}{{downVotes}}{{/isLast}}{{/replies.comments}}{{/replies.totalCount}}{{^replies.totalCount}}{{initials}}{{userAlias}}, United Kingdom, {{formattedDateAndTime}}{{message}}

{{upVotes}}{{downVotes}}{{/replies.totalCount}}{{/isComment}}The opinions and views expressed in the comments section are solely those of the individual users and do not represent or reflect the opinions, views, or positions of MailOnline. MailOnline does not endorse, support, or verify the accuracy of any user-generated content.Terms|Privacy|FeedbackOldest{{#isModerationStatus}}{{moderationStatus}}