Eeei Okudzeto Ablakwa. It’s Beginning to Make Sense Now Why You Are So Eager to Evacuate More People

In her Official Facebook Post on 11 October 2026, commentator Adwoa Animah raised sharp concerns about the evacuation exercises spearheaded by Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, suggesting that profiteering and irregularities may be driving the eagerness to repatriate more Ghanaians. Her post, titled “Eeeei Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa. Now it’s beginning to make sense why you are so eager to evacuate more people”, accused the Member of Parliament of exploiting the evacuation process for financial gain, even hinting at the existence of “ghost names” in the expenditure records.

Animah’s critique comes in the wake of revelations that GH¢16.4 million was spent on evacuating nearly 2,000 Ghanaians from South Africa. While Ablakwa has defended the expenditure as necessary to protect citizens in distress, critics like Animah argue that the figures are inflated and lack transparency. Her reference to “ghost names zalaa” suggests suspicion that the evacuation lists may have been padded with fictitious beneficiaries to justify higher spending.

At a deeper level, Animah’s post reflects the theme of accountability and public trust in governance. Evacuations are humanitarian exercises meant to safeguard lives, but when questions of profiteering and irregularities arise, they risk undermining the moral legitimacy of such efforts. Her commentary underscores the need for independent audits and transparent reporting to assure citizens that public funds are being used responsibly.

The tone of her post was accusatory and incredulous, blending frustration with sarcasm. By framing Ablakwa’s eagerness to evacuate more people as financially motivated, she sought to expose what she perceives as hypocrisy and exploitation. For many readers, her words resonate with broader frustrations about corruption and misuse of public funds in Ghana.

Observers note that Animah’s intervention adds to mounting pressure on government officials to account for evacuation expenditures. The Minority caucus in Parliament has already demanded an independent audit of the GH¢16.4 million spending, reinforcing the perception that transparency is lacking. Animah’s post amplifies these concerns by framing them in everyday language that connects with ordinary citizens.

In conclusion, Adwoa Animah’s post “Eeeei Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa. Now it’s beginning to make sense why you are so eager to evacuate more people” is a sharp indictment of perceived profiteering in humanitarian interventions. It challenges Ablakwa and the government to prove that evacuation exercises are driven by genuine concern for citizens rather than financial gain, reminding leaders that accountability is the cornerstone of public trust.

Source: Adwoa Animah, Official Facebook Post, 11 October 2026

NewsExpress feedback-opera-news-app@opera.com