Bipartisan bill barring U.S. purchase of Russian oil on the horizon: Fitzpatrick
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) announced on Saturday he would be introducing a bipartisan bill aimed at stopping President Trump from lifting sanctions on Russian oil amid global fuel shortages.
āWe will be introducing bipartisan legislation to block any and all purchases of Russian oil. It will be called the āRonald Reagan Peace Through Strength Act,āā Fitzpatrick wrote on social media, although it is currently unclear who the Democratic sponsors for the legislation are.
He added that he will force a vote on the bill through a discharge petition and that he believes āit will overwhelminglyā pass.
āIāve already agreed to be an original cosponsor,ā Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) wrote on social media. āCongress must make a stand.ā
Trumpās deal, which was announced Friday, permits Russia to supply 300,000 tons of diesel to the U.S. and the global marketplace. Moscow already confirmed its readiness to supply oil and petroleum to the U.S. and global markets, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a statement, according to Russian state media.
On Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned the deal signaled to Russia that āit could simply keep attackingā his country. Trump responded, telling reporters outside the White House that Zelensky ācould have settled this war many times,ā but āchose not to.ā
āI suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal,ā the president continued.
The deal drew criticism from both sides of the aisle, including Rep. Gabe Amo (D-R.I.), who sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
āAfter signing a law to ramp up sanctions on Russia, Trump is paying Putin for oil to deal with the high gas prices caused by his choice of war with Iran? Thatās not punishing Putin, thatās profit,ā Amo wrote on social media, adding, āMake it make sense.ā
In 2022, Congress passed a bill to ban the imports of Russian oil and authorize further sanctions but it contained an exception for the president to allow energy that was already purchased before the legislation passed, or in cases where the importation would be in the national interest.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your opinion!