Assessing Nigeria’s political weight in CAF and FIFA

Two heartbreaking sporting tragedies experienced by the Nigerian football recently are, without a doubt, the explosive revelation that FIFA’s legal department covered up the ineligibility of DR Congo goalkeeper, Lionel Mpasi—allowing the country to take Nigeria’s place in the 2026 World Cup qualifiers—and the belated apology from the Confederation of African Football (CAF) for approving the “horse-racing pitch” which Guinea-Bissau used to embarrass Nigeria in the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) qualifier. These two injustices against Nigeria went unchallenged as if the country were an orphan within continental and global football politics.

A similar treatment was meted out to Nigeria with little or no resistance when the country’s direct rival, South Africa, was handed an obvious advantage during the African qualifiers for the 2026 World Cup. Because neither country possessed stadium facilities that met the strict accreditation standards of FIFA and CAF, Zimbabwe and Lesotho adopted South Africa as their home ground. This logistical situation handed Bafana Bafana a massive, unique advantage in Group C, which they eventually won.

Out of the 10 total group matches, South Africa essentially got to play nearly all of their matches inside their own country. When it was time for Bafana Bafana to travel for their “away” fixtures against Zimbabwe and Lesotho, they simply played them in South Africa. Instead of facing hostile crowds and challenging travel protocols, Bafana Bafana played in front of home fans seven times. They only travelled to play Nigeria, Benin Republic and Rwanda. Many Nigerians still wonder if the country’s top officials in CAF and FIFA were sleeping when the decision to approve South Africa as a home ground for southern African neighbours, Zimbabwe and Lesotho was taken.

As a matter of fact, it is becoming clearer by the day that Nigeria is fast losing its potency, both on the field and in the boardroom. What is also worrisome is that several prominent Nigerian football administrators and legal professionals still occupy highly strategic seats within both FIFA and Confédération Africaine de Football (CAF) governance ecosystems. The biggest challenge, however, is that these ambassadors of Nigerian football seem not to be effectively serving the interests of their country, casting a huge shadow of doubt on their relevance.

Let me remind Nigerians that for the first time since the founding of the Confédération Africaine de Football (CAF) in 1957, a Nigerian sits in the “engine room” of African football administration. Following the abrupt resignation of Veron Mosengo-Omba, seasoned football bureaucrat, Samson Adamu, was appointed acting general secretary of CAF. Positioned at the heart of continental football logistics, Adamu represents an unprecedented high-water mark for Nigerian technical governance.

Simultaneously, the global governance ecosystem at FIFA features prominent Nigerian stakeholders occupying highly specialised seats. A former NFF president, Alhaji Ibrahim Musa Gusau, handles regional oversight via the FIFA Men’s Club Competitions Committee. In the legal and media landscapes, Abdulhakeem Mustapha, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), anchors the FIFA Anti-Racism and Anti-Discrimination Committee, while a veteran broadcaster, Aisha Falode, shapes narrative strategy on the FIFA Media and Communications Committee.

Adding to this institutional blueprint is the self-acclaimed “Life President of the NFF,” Amaju Pinnick, who continues to wield massive authority as a special adviser to CAF President Patrice Motsepe. Even if you dislike him, you cannot deny the fact that Pinnick is close to the most influential people in the present FIFA hierarchy.

Meanwhile, Nnaemeka Olu, an international lawyer, acts as a key CAF administrative representative and has recently been part of joint FIFA-CAF collaborative field delegations. He was a member of the joint FIFA and CAF assessment mission that recently consulted with stakeholders following the mass resignation of top NFF officials.

However, as I mentioned earlier, despite this heavy administrative footprint, the central question for stakeholders remains painfully raw: What is the actual use of this power if it fails to protect Nigerian interests?

It would be recalled that when the NFF challenged the DR Congo over the eligibility of an allegedly illegal player, Nigeria’s petition was dismissed by FIFA on technical grounds—reportedly due to an “inadmissible” and late filing. The fallout sparked heavy public criticism. Former NFF President Ibrahim Gusau publicly lambasted FIFA for its handling of the case, alleging that the body hid behind technicalities to cover up an institutional crisis. So, I ask again: Where were our big guys in FIFA and CAF when this broad daylight robbery, revealed by reputable media houses: The New York Times and Le Monde, was carried out against Nigeria?

My honest verdict is that Nigeria is not lacking representatives in both CAF and FIFA; it has a leverage problem. Having a seat at the table is entirely different from dictating the menu. Until Nigerian administrators in CAF and FIFA transition from simply occupying prestigious executive committee seats to building an organised, proactive sports diplomacy network, Nigeria’s presence in global football governance will remain what it is today: a prestigious shadow masking a powerless reality. We want to see our ambassadors fighting to defend or protect our interest in continental and global football ecosystem.

Join Daily Trust WhatsApp Community For Quick Access To News and Happenings Around You.