Former Bellingham First Responders’ COVID Vaccine Mandate Case Ends as Supreme Court Declines to Hear It

Bay Area Heat Advisory Extended to Thursday as Inland Highs Near 105 and Ozone Raises Heart, Lung RisksBay Area heat advisory runs to 10 p.m. Thursday, with inland highs near 105. An ozone alert adds risk for heart and lung patients, kids, and seniors. Surprise Medical Bill Protections Still Shield Patients as Insurers and Doctors Battle Over 7 Million Payment DisputesInsurers and doctors are fighting over payments, but No Surprises Act rights still apply. Here is how to spot and report an illegal surprise bill. Texas Attorney General Probes UnitedHealth Over Allegations It Paid Nursing Homes to Delay Hospital Care for PatientsTexas AG Ken Paxton issued civil investigative demands to UnitedHealth over allegations that it paid nursing homes to delay hospital transfers. FTC Warns 24 Health Care Companies That Price Quotes Omitting Doctor or Facility Fees May Break Federal LawThe FTC warned 24 large health care companies that leaving doctor or facility fees out of price quotes may be deceptive. What patients should know. Mental Health Man Checked Himself Into a Psychiatric Hospital Three Times on Zolpidem and Remembered None of ItA 44-year-old man woke up in a psychiatric hospital three times with no memory of admitting himself. Doctors traced it to his zolpidem pill. A Teen’s Ankle Sore Washed Off with Water, Revealing a Marker Drawing and Hidden Exam StressA 17-year-old’s dark ankle sore was rinsed off as doctors prepared an ECG. Athens doctors traced the marker drawing to examine stress and low mood. A Man Whistled a John Denver Hit While Partly Asleep, Kept the Beat, and Remembered NothingA 30-year-old man whistled “Take Me Home, Country Roads” during a partial arousal from deep sleep, swaying in time, then forgot it all. Magnolia Woman Admits Billing Medicaid $477,872 for Therapy Never Given and Misusing a Nurse Practitioner’s IdentityA Magnolia, Texas, woman pleaded guilty to billing Medicaid for fake therapy with a nurse practitioner’s ID. Here is how to spot and report fraud. Innovation Nobel Prize for Optogenetics Spotlights Depression and Parkinson’s Research in Mice, but No Approved Human Treatment ExistsThe 2026 Nobel Prize honors optogenetics. Here is what the brain research means for depression and Parkinson’s patients, and what it does not. Six Physician Groups Push Back After RFK Jr. Says AI Gives Better-Informed Second Opinions Than Any DoctorSix physician groups say AI is not better informed than doctors after RFK Jr.’s summit remarks. Here is how to use AI chatbots safely and with care. A Neurologist Couldn’t Stop Rhyming After Strokes and Seizures, So He Took Up Freestyle RapAfter strokes and seizures, a neurologist felt an urge to rhyme that led him to freestyle rap. New brain mapping puts his cerebellum in a new light. Zap One Brain Network and People Laugh Without Feeling Any JoyA 2026 review maps two laughter networks in the brain, one that brings real mirth and one that makes people laugh without any joy at all. Healthy Living Isaiah Washington Reveals Wife Jenisa Died of a Hemorrhagic Stroke, Urging Families to Take Severe Headaches SeriouslyIsaiah Washington says his wife, Jenisa, died of a massive hemorrhagic stroke. Here is why a sudden, severe headache can be a 911 emergency. Soy-Allergic Shoppers in Cincinnati, Dayton and Northern Kentucky Should Check Freezers for Recalled Saint Francis Apizza PizzasSaint Francis Apizza recalled four frozen pizzas sold in Cincinnati, Dayton, and Northern Kentucky over undeclared soy. See stores and refund steps. Monongalia County Investigates 16 Lab-Confirmed Salmonella Cases Near Morgantown, with Several Hospitalized and No Source Found YetMon County health officials are tracing 16 lab-confirmed Salmonella cases near Morgantown. See the symptoms to watch for and when to call a doctor. Pediatricians Tell Pregnant Women and Parents of Young Children to Skip Raw Milk, Citing Listeria and Bird FluNew AAP policy says raw milk is unsafe for pregnant women and young kids, citing Listeria, E. coli, and H5N1 bird flu. Here is what parents should know. Covid – 19 FDA Proposes Requiring Companies to Report Food Additives That Now Reach Grocery Shelves Without Federal ReviewFDA has released its proposed GRAS rule requiring companies to notify the agency about food additives. Here is what the proposal does and does not do. Federal Regulators Warn Some Hair Dryer Brushes Lack the Part That Stops ElectrocutionCPSC warns hair dryer brushes sold on Walmart.com and TikTok Shop lack immersion protection. The seller has not agreed to a recall or refund. A Recalled Teething Toy Broke the Pattern Parents Were Told to Look ForA newly recalled pull-string teething toy has a different model number and design from earlier recalls, and one choking incident has been reported. Trying to Lower Blood Sugar, Cholesterol or Blood Pressure? Different Workouts Suited Different MarkersA pooled analysis of 53 trials found that different exercise types helped different metabolic markers. Most of the evidence was low certainty. Mario Tama | Getty Images Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Pocket The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 5 declined to hear a challenge by former Bellingham, Washington, first responders and city workers who lost their jobs after refusing the city’s 2021 COVID-19 vaccine requirement. The decision leaves in place rulings by two lower federal courts that dismissed their lawsuit.

The case, Brock v. City of Bellingham, appeared on the Court’s order list among petitions denied without comment. No justice noted a dissent. For the 18 former employees who brought the petition, the denial likely ends their federal case. The petition was filed Aug. 24, considered at the justices’ Sept. 28 private conference, and denied a week later.

The petitioners included former police officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, an inspector, and a wastewater supervisor, according to Cascadia Daily News. The original lawsuit, filed in 2024 against the city and former Mayor Seth Fleetwood, challenged an executive order issued in September 2021 that required city employees to be vaccinated.

The lawsuit argued that the 14th Amendment protects a right to refuse “investigational” or “new” drugs. It also claimed violations of due process, equal protection, and privacy, along with wrongful termination. The case did not raise a religious freedom claim.

The petition argued that lower courts “failed to address whether the 14th Amendment precludes states and their political subdivisions from mandating the administration of ‘new drugs,'” The Spokesman-Review reported. Attorney David Schexnaydre earlier said his clients were “forced to choose between a rock and a whirlpool.”

In January 2025, U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein dismissed all claims. She noted that the FDA had fully approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine on Aug. 23, 2021, before the mandate took effect, so the vaccine was not investigational. She also found that federal emergency-use and PREP Act provisions do not give individuals a right to sue under civil rights law, and that the mandate did not implicate a fundamental right, according to the district court ruling.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed in May 2026 in an unpublished decision. “We have already concluded that substantially similar mandates, which were imposed for substantially similar reasons, survive rational basis review,” the three-judge panel wrote in its memorandum.

The city waived its right to respond to the petition. No public statement from the city or the plaintiffs’ attorney on the denial was available in the reporting reviewed by MedicalDaily.

A refusal to hear a case does not mean the Supreme Court agreed with the lower courts. According to the Court’s own guidance, a denial “signifies only that the Court has chosen not to accept the case for review and does not express the Court’s view of the merits of the case.” The Court hears arguments in only about 1% of cases filed each term.

Because the denial sets no national precedent, its legal effect is limited to this case, and other courts remain free to reach their own conclusions. The Ninth Circuit’s decision was also unpublished, which means it does not bind future cases in that circuit, though it reflects how the court has treated similar mandates.

The outcome fits a broader pattern. Courts have largely upheld workplace and school vaccine requirements under long-standing precedent. In September, the justices also turned away an emergency request from a New York mother seeking a religious exemption for her kindergartner.

The Bellingham case stems from a 2021 mandate. The denial does not create new rules for current workers, and it does not affect vaccine availability.

For workers, the main lesson is practical. Employer vaccine policies, especially for health care and public safety jobs, often depend on state law, union contracts, and whether medical or religious accommodations are offered. Workers with concerns can review their employer’s written policy, ask about accommodation procedures, and keep copies of any requests.

People with medical concerns about a vaccine should discuss them with a clinician, who can review their health history and any documented reactions. Possible vaccine injuries can be reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

The Bellingham workers’ federal case is over, but the denial decides nothing beyond their case, and the debate over mandates and exemptions continues in other courts.

What did the Supreme Court decide? On Oct. 5, it declined to hear Brock v. City of Bellingham, leaving lower court dismissals in place. No justice noted a dissent.

Who brought the case? Eighteen former Bellingham employees, including police officers, firefighters, and EMTs, who lost their jobs after refusing the 2021 mandate, petitioned the Court.

What did the workers argue? They argued the 14th Amendment protects a right to refuse new or investigational drugs and claimed due process and equal protection violations.

Does the denial set a national precedent? No. A denial does not express the Court’s view on the merits and does not bind other courts.

Does this affect vaccine rules today? Not directly. The decision creates no new rules for current workers and does not affect vaccine availability.