Former Bellingham First Responders’ COVID Vaccine Mandate Case Ends as Supreme Court Declines to Hear It

Health Care Supplied Three of Every Four New U.S. Jobs Over the Past Year as September Hiring CooledHealth care added 372,000 jobs in a year, about 75% of U.S. job growth, a Peterson-KFF brief finds, while September hiring in the sector slowed. Michael Caputo, a Head and Neck Cancer Survivor, Joins the President’s Cancer Panel Advising the White HouseHead and neck cancer survivor Michael Caputo joins the President’s Cancer Panel, which reports to the White House on national cancer efforts. White House’s $64 Billion Medicaid Drug Savings Claim Rests on a 10-Year Projection with Murky DetailsA FactCheck.org review finds the White House’s $64 billion Medicaid drug savings claim rests on a 10-year projection with key details still unclear. Sardinian Village Women Who Reach 70 Have a 13.8% Chance of Reaching 100, Versus 3.6% for U.S. WomenWomen in Bolotana, Sardinia, who reach 70 have a 13.8% chance of living to 100, versus 3.6% for U.S. women, a records-verified population study finds. Mental Health His Wife Says Decades of Sleep Talking Nearly Went Quiet After Hypnosis Gave Her a One-Word CueA man’s decades-long sleep talking faded after hypnosis gave his wife a librarian’s “Shhhh” as a cue, a case report says. Here’s what it shows. A Teen’s Narcolepsy Dose Went Up, Then She Began Eating in Her Sleep with No Memory of ItA 15-year-old with narcolepsy began eating in her sleep after a sodium oxybate dose increase. A lower dose and safety steps ended it. A Woman Smoked, Ate, and Walked in Her Sleep, and the Behaviors Returned Every Time Her Medication StoppedA woman sleepwalked, ate, and smoked during sleep. A 2022 case report found that one bedtime drug quieted all three until it was stopped. Doctors Spent 15 Hours Shaving Down a Giant Hairball Inside a 7-Year-Old Girl’s Stomach to Avoid SurgeryDoctors in China spent about 15 hours removing a hairball laced with cotton threads from a 7-year-old’s stomach without cutting her open. Innovation Burping and Swallowing Set Off Her Vertigo Months After Ear Surgery, and a Tiny Implant Was Behind ItA woman’s vertigo struck when she burped or swallowed months after ear surgery. Tests implicated her ear implant, and its removal ended the spells. No Rash, No Fever, No Confusion: A Finger-Injury Fat Embolism Case Passes One Diagnostic Scale but Likely Fails AnotherA man with fat embolism after a finger injury lacked the classic rash and confusion. The scoring system doctors use can change the verdict. AI Companies, Not Utah, Pay the Evaluators Checking Their Health Tools in the State’s Expanding SandboxUtah’s health AI sandbox lets companies pay the third-party evaluators checking their tools, raising independence questions as new pilots begin. UCLA and Mount Sinai Begin a $4 Million NIH Study on Why Colitis Symptoms Persist After Inflammation HealsUCLA and Mount Sinai will study why about 1 in 3 ulcerative colitis patients keep IBS-like symptoms after inflammation heals, with a $4M NIH grant. Healthy Living Former Bellingham First Responders’ COVID Vaccine Mandate Case Ends as Supreme Court Declines to Hear ItThe Supreme Court won’t hear 18 former Bellingham workers’ challenge to the city’s 2021 COVID vaccine mandate, leaving dismissals in place. Soap Star Robert Kelker-Kelly’s Death After Reported Chest Pain Puts Focus on Heart Attack Signs and Calling 911Robert Kelker-Kelly died after reportedly complaining of chest pain. Here are heart attack signs in men and women and why calling 911 beats driving. Penn Nursing Editorial Urges Hospitals to Treat Nurse Staffing as Emergency Infrastructure When Heat Waves StrikeA Penn Nursing editorial urges hospitals to treat nurse staffing as emergency infrastructure, since heat-illness patients need close monitoring. A Toddler Stopped Breathing with a Strangulation-Like Mark on His Neck, and the Cause Was His Mother’s HairA 17-month-old stopped breathing while co-sleeping. The thin mark on his neck looked like strangulation, but the cause was his mother’s hair. Covid – 19 FDA Proposes Requiring Companies to Report Food Additives That Now Reach Grocery Shelves Without Federal ReviewFDA has released its proposed GRAS rule requiring companies to notify the agency about food additives. Here is what the proposal does and does not do. Federal Regulators Warn Some Hair Dryer Brushes Lack the Part That Stops ElectrocutionCPSC warns hair dryer brushes sold on Walmart.com and TikTok Shop lack immersion protection. The seller has not agreed to a recall or refund. A Recalled Teething Toy Broke the Pattern Parents Were Told to Look ForA newly recalled pull-string teething toy has a different model number and design from earlier recalls, and one choking incident has been reported. Trying to Lower Blood Sugar, Cholesterol or Blood Pressure? Different Workouts Suited Different MarkersA pooled analysis of 53 trials found that different exercise types helped different metabolic markers. Most of the evidence was low certainty. Mario Tama | Getty Images Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Pocket The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 5 declined to hear a challenge by former Bellingham, Washington, first responders and city workers who lost their jobs after refusing the city’s 2021 COVID-19 vaccine requirement. The decision leaves in place rulings by two lower federal courts that dismissed their lawsuit.

The case, Brock v. City of Bellingham, appeared on the Court’s order list among petitions denied without comment. No justice noted a dissent. For the 18 former employees who brought the petition, the denial likely ends their federal case. The petition was filed Aug. 24, considered at the justices’ Sept. 28 private conference, and denied a week later.

The petitioners included former police officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, an inspector, and a wastewater supervisor, according to Cascadia Daily News. The original lawsuit, filed in 2024 against the city and former Mayor Seth Fleetwood, challenged an executive order issued in September 2021 that required city employees to be vaccinated.

The lawsuit argued that the 14th Amendment protects a right to refuse “investigational” or “new” drugs. It also claimed violations of due process, equal protection, and privacy, along with wrongful termination. The case did not raise a religious freedom claim.

The petition argued that lower courts “failed to address whether the 14th Amendment precludes states and their political subdivisions from mandating the administration of ‘new drugs,'” The Spokesman-Review reported. Attorney David Schexnaydre earlier said his clients were “forced to choose between a rock and a whirlpool.”

In January 2025, U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein dismissed all claims. She noted that the FDA had fully approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine on Aug. 23, 2021, before the mandate took effect, so the vaccine was not investigational. She also found that federal emergency-use and PREP Act provisions do not give individuals a right to sue under civil rights law, and that the mandate did not implicate a fundamental right, according to the district court ruling.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed in May 2026 in an unpublished decision. “We have already concluded that substantially similar mandates, which were imposed for substantially similar reasons, survive rational basis review,” the three-judge panel wrote in its memorandum.

The city waived its right to respond to the petition. No public statement from the city or the plaintiffs’ attorney on the denial was available in the reporting reviewed by MedicalDaily.

A refusal to hear a case does not mean the Supreme Court agreed with the lower courts. According to the Court’s own guidance, a denial “signifies only that the Court has chosen not to accept the case for review and does not express the Court’s view of the merits of the case.” The Court hears arguments in only about 1% of cases filed each term.

Because the denial sets no national precedent, its legal effect is limited to this case, and other courts remain free to reach their own conclusions. The Ninth Circuit’s decision was also unpublished, which means it does not bind future cases in that circuit, though it reflects how the court has treated similar mandates.

The outcome fits a broader pattern. Courts have largely upheld workplace and school vaccine requirements under long-standing precedent. In September, the justices also turned away an emergency request from a New York mother seeking a religious exemption for her kindergartner.

The Bellingham case stems from a 2021 mandate. The denial does not create new rules for current workers, and it does not affect vaccine availability.

For workers, the main lesson is practical. Employer vaccine policies, especially for health care and public safety jobs, often depend on state law, union contracts, and whether medical or religious accommodations are offered. Workers with concerns can review their employer’s written policy, ask about accommodation procedures, and keep copies of any requests.

People with medical concerns about a vaccine should discuss them with a clinician, who can review their health history and any documented reactions. Possible vaccine injuries can be reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

The Bellingham workers’ federal case is over, but the denial decides nothing beyond their case, and the debate over mandates and exemptions continues in other courts.

What did the Supreme Court decide? On Oct. 5, it declined to hear Brock v. City of Bellingham, leaving lower court dismissals in place. No justice noted a dissent.

Who brought the case? Eighteen former Bellingham employees, including police officers, firefighters, and EMTs, who lost their jobs after refusing the 2021 mandate, petitioned the Court.

What did the workers argue? They argued the 14th Amendment protects a right to refuse new or investigational drugs and claimed due process and equal protection violations.

Does the denial set a national precedent? No. A denial does not express the Court’s view on the merits and does not bind other courts.

Does this affect vaccine rules today? Not directly. The decision creates no new rules for current workers and does not affect vaccine availability.