Big Bets Need Small Proofs: How CEOs Can Pursue Growth Without Asking For Blind Trust

This voice experience is generated by AI. Learn more.This voice experience is generated by AI. Learn more.Eric Reicin, President & CEO of BBB National Programs, a nonprofit organization dedicated to a more accountable, trustworthy marketplace.

gettyThomas Jefferson’s bet on the Corps of Discovery is a masterclass in structured uncertainty.​

Rather than sending one large expedition that could not course-correct, Jefferson built in reporting checkpoints, gave Lewis and Clark authority to adjust the historic expedition into the newly acquired Louisiana Territory based on what they found and acknowledged in his instructions that the outcome was unknown. The bet was bold. The structure was disciplined. And small proofs and course corrections assisted in the historic execution.​

Today’s business leaders can learn from Jefferson’s structured bet.

Most CEOs are operating with a growth mindset. The Oliver Wyman Forum/NYSE CEO Agenda 2026 survey found that most leaders are no longer waiting for stability before they act. They are converting disruption into competitive advantage. Ninety-four percent plan to pursue M&A. Revenue growth and market share are the defining priorities for most CEOs.​

While the pressure to grow is on, so is the obligation to lead responsibly. The challenge is how to make big bets without asking stakeholders to accept ambition on faith. In my view, the best big bets are often supported by small proofs.​

For many, the instinct in uncertain conditions is to pause. But recent MIT Sloan Management Review research analyzing companies navigating high-uncertainty events found that common assumptions about when organizations can safely take significant risks did not align with outcomes.​

Uncertainty is a reason to structure commitments so that learning remains possible. As I have written previously, leadership in the gray requires making consequential decisions before every fact is known. The challenge is creating enough clarity to move responsibly despite uncertainty.​

CEO Satya Nadella captured a similar discipline in his 2025 annual shareholder letter, writing that Microsoft’s approach requires the ability to “think in decades and execute in quarters,” holding a long-term commitment steady while remaining rigorous about what must be proven in the near term. In other words, small proofs in light of a larger big growth goal.​

A big bet becomes a request for blind trust when assumptions remain hidden.​

Leaders may describe market opportunity without showing why their organization is positioned to serve it, announce a transformation without identifying the concrete outcome that should improve or commit capital before defining what would cause them to slow down, pivot or stop.​

Professor Linda Hill, drawing on research involving roughly 9,000 executives, argues that effective leaders must be able to make decisions amid ambiguity while using experimentation to generate evidence along the way. The critical discipline, Hill says, is to “pay attention to what’s the feedback.” Do not eliminate uncertainty before acting, but design action so that evidence informs what comes next.​

Before scaling a consequential strategic bet, my view is that leaders should be able to answer at least the following six questions with evidence.​

1. Proof Of Need: Is the organization solving a significant problem for a defined customer, beneficiary or stakeholder? Look for measurable real-value indicators, not projected value.

2. Proof Of Operational Feasibility: Can the organization deliver consistently in a constrained setting by understanding failure rates, staffing and partner dependencies?

3. Proof Of Economics: For a business, proof of economics means unit economics and a path to return on investment. For a mission-driven organization, it could mean the same return on investment, but does it mean reasonable impact per dollar, sustainability and alignment with core purpose?

4. Proof Of Accountability: What happens after an error or unintended consequence? There should be a clear owner, transparent standards and a practical remedy designed before scaling, not after the first crisis.

5. Proof Of Scale Readiness: Can systems, people and governance expand without degrading quality or obscuring responsibility?

6. Proof Of AI: Will agentic AI materially alter the landscape of this bet within the planning horizon? Which of the prior proofs are most vulnerable to AI?​

For some of these gates, proof is perishable. A conclusion supported today may not remain as the environment and technology changes. Leaders must continue testing whether the assumptions justifying the original decision still hold. At each gate, the decision is made to expand, revise, pause or stop.​

Before an initiative begins, leaders should identify their stop rules, such as:

We believe this opportunity exists because …

We will modify or stop the initiative if …

Those statements convert confidence into a testable small proof proposition and make it harder to move the goalposts when early results are inconvenient.​

Some strategic bets also require proof beyond the organization’s own assessment. Consumer trust is not built on internal confidence. It is built on demonstrated accountability that stakeholders can see and verify. This is where industry self-regulation, voluntary certifications and independent accountability frameworks could play a role in how companies make their proofs. These mechanisms provide the external validation that allows bold action to earn trust rather than simply assert it.​

As I have argued previously, in a marketplace where trust must be demonstrated rather than assumed, independent accountability can make a bold strategy more credible.​

When the famed Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton’s ship Endurance became trapped in ice, he abandoned the original mission and shouldered a new one: to bring everyone home. He established clear decision rules at each stage and adjusted course as conditions changed. Shackleton built in small proof gates without calling them that. He tested the ice conditions incrementally, established clear decision rules for when to abandon ship and adjusted course as evidence required through a two-year ordeal. Every passenger survived. ​

CEOs will continue to make big bets. And they should.

Jefferson and Shackleton provide lessons for us today. The leaders who earn lasting stakeholder confidence are those who understand that bold bets are often built on small proofs, that the direction is right and the organization is ready to move ahead.

Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?