The dispute has escalated into a rare diplomatic row between Ghana and one of the tournament’s host nations, with Accra accusing Ottawa of relying on unproven allegations and disregarding the principle of presumption of innocence.
In a strongly worded statement issued by Ghana’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the government described Canada’s decision as “high-handed and extremely unfair” and revealed that it had formally protested the move while exploring legal and diplomatic avenues to challenge the refusal.
According to the Ghanaian government, Canadian authorities denied Partey’s temporary residence application on inadmissibility grounds linked to ongoing criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom that have not resulted in a conviction or judicial finding of guilt.
“The Government of Ghana reaffirms the fundamental legal principle of the presumption of innocence, a cornerstone of justice and due process in democratic societies,” the ministry said.
Ghana’s Foreign Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, disclosed that his ministry had already submitted an official note of protest to Global Affairs Canada and was engaging Canadian officials, including Canada’s High Commissioner to Ghana, in an effort to secure a review of the decision.
The government said it is prepared to pursue all available diplomatic, legal and administrative remedies under Canadian and international law, including judicial review before Canada’s Federal Court if necessary.
The decision means Partey will miss Ghana’s opening World Cup match against Panama in Toronto, depriving the Black Stars of one of their most experienced players at a crucial stage of the tournament.
The midfielder, who has been a key figure for both club and country over the past decade, was named in Ghana’s World Cup squad despite the ongoing legal proceedings in the United Kingdom.
The case has also reignited debate about the intersection of immigration policy and international sport.
Canada, one of three co-hosts of the 2026 FIFA World Cup alongside the United States and Mexico, has maintained that participation in a major sporting event does not exempt individuals from the country’s immigration laws.
The dispute is significant beyond football.
For Ghana, one of Africa’s representatives at the World Cup, the visa refusal raises concerns about how immigration policies may affect athletes participating in global sporting events.
For Canada, it highlights the challenge of balancing immigration enforcement with the expectations and logistical demands that come with hosting the world’s biggest sporting tournament.
While Partey remains eligible to feature in Ghana’s remaining group-stage matches in the United States, the diplomatic fallout from Canada’s decision is unlikely to disappear quickly.
What began as an immigration ruling has now evolved into a dispute involving international diplomacy, legal principles and one of Africa’s highest-profile footballers on the eve of the world’s biggest sporting event.
