In a deeply concerning development, recent data reveal that 2,470 Ghanaian nationals are currently held in United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities, awaiting deportation. This figure marks one of the highest recorded levels of detainees from Ghana and underscores escalating tensions in U.S.–Ghana migration and deportation policies.
The uptick in Ghanaian detainees aligns with more aggressive U.S. enforcement under the Trump administration. The Global Enforcement Initiative, launched in April 2025, is cited by observers as a key driver of the surge in arrests and removals.
In the first eight months of 2025 alone, 478 Ghanaian have been arrested by ICE.
Over the same period, 312 Ghanaian have been deported to Accra, representing a 17 percent increase over comparable deportations in 2024.
Historically, from 2018 through 2023, annual deportations of Ghanaian ranged between 200 and 250.
One of the more controversial aspects of recent deportation policy has been the use of third-country removal—deporting non-U.S. citizens to countries where they are not citizens, under agreements with those countries.
Ghana has accepted such third-country nationals, citing its visa-free policy for West Africans and its willingness to cooperate with the U.S. on migration issues.
Critics argue this practice may undermine legal protections, including the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits returning individuals to locations where they may face persecution or harm.
Human rights organizations have filed lawsuits alleging that, during past deportation flights, some detainees were restrained—handcuffed, placed in straitjackets, and given minimal sustenance (bread and water) during long flights.
After arrival, a number of deportees reportedly remain in military or open detention camps in Ghana under harsh conditions.
Humanitarian, Legal, and Diplomatic Concerns
1. Rights and Treatment of Detainees
Detainees and legal representatives allege many were not properly informed of their destinations, lacked adequate legal representation, and suffered extreme physical restraints and poor conditions both in U.S. detention and after arrival in Ghana.
2. Sovereignty and Parliamentary Oversight in Ghana
Domestic critics in Ghana have raised questions about the legality of Ghana’s participation in third-country deportation agreements, citing that key treaties or agreements may not have been reviewed or approved by the national parliament.
3. Diplomatic Strain and International Norms
The U.S.’s approach to deportations has drawn criticism from human rights groups and legal experts who argue it may bypass due process and violate international conventions protecting asylum seekers and refugees.
4. Reintegration Challenges for Ghana
With potentially hundreds more deportees arriving in Ghana, government agencies may struggle to absorb and reintegrate them, especially those lacking financial resources, familial support, or documented status.
A Ghanaian rights group, Democracy Hub, has initiated legal action against the government’s acceptance of U.S. deportees, arguing the agreement with the U.S. is unconstitutional and may violate international protections.
The Ghanaian Attorney General has stated the government will defend the arrangement in court.
Some of the deportees—particularly 11 of the 14 recently sent to Ghana—have filed suits in Ghanaian courts, asserting unlawful detention and demanding release.
U.S. and Ghanaian authorities have yet to fully respond to demands for clarity regarding the treatment, relocation, and legal access of those deported or awaiting deportation.
Source