A major development has hit Ghana’s political and legal landscape as the Attorney General has reportedly directed Parliament to commence an official validation process to dismiss the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) from office with immediate effect.
The shocking directive, which has stirred intense national debate, is said to stem from growing concerns over alleged administrative misconduct, abuse of power, and breaches of procedural ethics within the OSP’s operations. According to reports, the Attorney General’s office believes that the recent controversies surrounding the OSP have significantly eroded public trust and undermined the credibility of the institution created to fight corruption at the highest levels.
Sources close to the Ministry of Justice revealed that the directive calls for Parliament to activate constitutional procedures that would assess the conduct of the Special Prosecutor and determine whether he should be relieved of his duties. The process, according to insiders, is expected to involve both legal and parliamentary scrutiny, including an official review of several petitions already submitted against the OSP.
The Attorney General is said to have raised concerns about how the OSP has handled several high-profile corruption cases, alleging that its methods have violated key legal protocols and disregarded constitutional limits. Critics within government circles claim that the OSP’s approach has been politically motivated and lacking in due process, while supporters argue that the institution is being targeted for exposing corruption within the political elite.
Legal experts have described the Attorney General’s directive as “unprecedented” and politically sensitive, warning that the move could trigger a constitutional standoff between the Executive and an office established to operate independently. They caution that if not handled carefully, the situation could weaken Ghana’s anti-corruption framework and further polarize the nation.
Meanwhile, opposition parties and civil society organizations have condemned the Attorney General’s move, viewing it as a deliberate attempt to silence the Special Prosecutor and derail ongoing investigations into corruption involving powerful individuals. They insist that instead of seeking dismissal, the government should strengthen the OSP’s independence and provide more support for its anti-corruption mission.
As of now, Parliament has not officially confirmed receipt of the Attorney General’s directive. However, sources within the House indicate that discussions are already underway among committee members on how to handle the matter, given its potential implications for governance, accountability, and public confidence.
The unfolding situation has left Ghanaians divided, with many awaiting an official statement from both the Office of the Attorney General and the OSP to clarify the next steps. Political observers believe the coming days will be crucial in determining the future of Ghana’s fight against corruption and the fate of the country’s top anti-graft office.
Source