A recently circulated official letter from the Office of the President of Ghana has sparked widespread discussion across social media platforms. The document, dated September 11, 2025, and signed by Callistus Mahama, Ph.D., Secretary to the President, announces the appointment of 18 Deputy Heads of Missions to various countries worldwide.
The appointments cover strategic diplomatic posts across multiple continents, including Germany, Switzerland, the United States, China, Canada, India, the United Kingdom, South Korea, the United Arab Emirates, the Netherlands, Italy, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Russia, South Africa, Egypt, and Denmark. The list includes a diverse group of appointees with various professional backgrounds and titles, ranging from doctors and generals to reverends.
The announcement has generated significant attention online, with Ghanaians expressing mixed reactions to the diplomatic appointments. Many citizens have taken to social media to voice their opinions about the scope and scale of these appointments, with discussions centering around government expenditure, the size of the diplomatic corps, and the administration’s approach to foreign representation.
Public discourse has revealed concerns about the cost implications of maintaining such an extensive diplomatic presence, particularly given the current economic climate. Some commentators have questioned whether the appointments align with campaign promises of running a lean government, while others have raised points about the qualifications and selection criteria for these prestigious positions.
The reactions reflect broader conversations about governance, fiscal responsibility, and the prioritization of national resources. Citizens have engaged in debates comparing previous administrations’ approaches to diplomatic appointments and analyzing the potential benefits and drawbacks of the current strategy.
As Ghana continues to strengthen its international relations, these appointments represent a significant investment in the country’s diplomatic infrastructure. However, the public response underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in government decisions, particularly those with substantial financial implications. The ongoing dialogue demonstrates Ghanaians’ active engagement in matters of national governance and their expectation for responsible stewardship of public resources.
