The group, popularly referred to as the “NPP TikTokers,” were convicted after being found guilty of offences related to inciting violence, issuing threats, and using social media to spread content deemed dangerous to public peace. The case, which has drawn nationwide attention, has now set a legal precedent for how Ghana’s justice system will address politically motivated online misconduct.
According to court documents, the NPP TikTokers had posted a series of videos on the platform making inflammatory statements, some of which allegedly contained threats against political opponents. The prosecution argued that their actions were not only irresponsible but also posed a real danger to national security, especially in the current politically charged climate.
During the trial, the defence attempted to argue that the videos were made in jest and should be seen as political banter. However, the presiding judge dismissed this claim, stating that political expression must never cross the line into threats of violence or incitement.
“The court will not tolerate the use of social media to promote hostility, threats, and actions that can destabilise the peace of the nation,” the judge stated while delivering the verdict.
Legal experts say the sentencing marks a turning point in Ghana’s handling of online political behaviour, signalling that digital platforms are no longer free zones for unregulated political attacks.
The NPP leadership has not issued an official statement on the ruling, but sources within the party indicate that there is concern over the political and public relations impact of the case. Some members fear that the judgment could discourage grassroots supporters from engaging in online campaigns, while others welcome the move as a warning to keep political discourse civil.
The convicted TikTokers are expected to serve their sentences in full unless they file a successful appeal. Their legal team has hinted at plans to challenge the ruling, citing possible violations of their clients’ rights to free speech.
Meanwhile, the case has sparked heated debates online, with social media users split between those who believe the sentence is too harsh and those who say it is necessary to curb growing political toxicity in Ghana’s digital space.