John Mahama is facing backlash after being warned to stop treating the Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, like he is the only chief in Ghana. Critics argue that Mahama’s engagements with Otumfuo often overshadow other traditional rulers, fueling concerns about favoritism in the country’s chieftaincy structure. The controversy erupted after Mahama’s recent visit to the Manhyia Palace, where he paid homage to Otumfuo during the final funeral rites of the late Mamponghene, Daasebre Osei Bonsu II.
The event saw Mahama and Otumfuo sharing a moment of mutual respect, further cementing their long-standing relationship. However, this interaction has sparked discussions about whether Mahama accords similar recognition to other paramount chiefs across Ghana.
Critics argue that while the Asantehene holds significant influence, Ghana’s traditional leadership extends beyond the Ashanti Kingdom. Some have called on Mahama to ensure balanced engagements with chiefs from other regions, emphasizing that no single ruler should be treated as the sole custodian of Ghanaian tradition and authority.
Mahama has previously acknowledged Otumfuo’s contributions to national development, including his quiet role in securing financial support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) during Ghana’s economic struggles in 2009. His deep respect for the Asantehene is evident in his public statements, where he has praised Otumfuo’s leadership in peacebuilding efforts, including mediation in the Bawku conflict.
Despite the criticisms, Mahama’s supporters argue that his engagements with Otumfuo are rooted in tradition and respect, rather than favoritism. They contend that the Asantehene’s historical significance and influence naturally warrant such interactions. Others believe that the backlash is politically motivated, aimed at undermining Mahama’s relationship with key traditional leaders ahead of the 2025 elections.
As the debate intensifies, Mahama may need to navigate these concerns carefully, ensuring that his engagements with traditional rulers reflect inclusivity and respect for Ghana’s diverse chieftaincy structure. Whether this controversy will impact his political standing remains to be seen, but one thing is certain—Ghana’s traditional leadership remains a crucial aspect of its governance and cultural identity.