Okatakyie Afrifa has once again found himself in the middle of controversy, this time taking direct aim at Kumawood actor Kwaku Manu over his comments regarding insults directed at President John Mahama. The outspoken media personality did not hold back, launching a scathing attack on Manu for what he sees as an attempt to shield Mahama from public criticism.
The dispute began when Kwaku Manu publicly called on Mahama to introduce legislation that would criminalize online insults against prominent figures, including the President and the Asantehene Otumfuo Osei Tutu II. Manu argued that social media has become a breeding ground for unwarranted attacks on respected individuals, suggesting that offenders should face a one-year jail sentence.
Afrifa, known for his fiery rhetoric, wasted no time in responding. He dismissed Manu’s concerns, arguing that public figures, especially politicians, must be prepared to face scrutiny and criticism. He accused Manu of attempting to silence dissent and questioned why similar calls were not made when other leaders faced harsh criticism. Afrifa’s response was blunt and unapologetic, making it clear that he believes freedom of speech should not be compromised.
The exchange has sparked intense debate across social media, with supporters of both men weighing in. Some agree with Manu, believing that Ghana’s political discourse has become too toxic, while others side with Afrifa, asserting that criticism—however harsh—is an essential part of democracy. The clash between the two personalities highlights the growing tension between respect for authority and the right to express dissent.
As the controversy unfolds, one thing is certain: the battle between political commentary and freedom of speech continues to shape Ghana’s media landscape. Whether Manu’s proposal gains traction or Afrifa’s stance prevails, the discussion underscores the delicate balance between protecting public figures and ensuring that citizens retain their right to voice their opinions. The coming days will reveal whether this debate leads to meaningful discourse or simply fades into the background of Ghana’s ever-evolving political scene.