Ibrahim Mahama (L) has accused Bright Simons (R) of defaming him in an article
The High Court in Accra has ordered Bright Simons, a vice president of IMANI Africa, to file his defence in the defamation suit filed against him by business mogul Ibrahim Mahama.
Court documents sighted by GhanaWeb showed that the IMANI Africa vice president had been commanded to file his defence within 8 days of service.
The court said that if Bright Simons fails to enter his defence within the stipulated time, it will give its judgment on the matter without hearing from him.
“AN ACTION having been commenced against you by the issue of this Writ by the above-named Plaintiff: IBRAHIM MAHAMA & ENGINEERS & PLANNERS COMPANY LTD.
“YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED that within EIGHT DAYS after service of this Writ on you, inclusive of the day of service, you do cause an appearance to be entered for you: BRIGHT SIMONS.
“AND TAKE NOTICE that in default of your so doing, judgment may be given in your absence without further notice to you,” parts of the court document, which was issued by the Acting Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie on May 28, 2025, read.
Ibrahim Mahama, who is a brother of President John Dramani Mahama, and his company, Engineers & Planners (E&P), sued Bright Simons over what they describe as defamatory statements made in a recent article.
The article, titled “Ghana Provides a Lesson in How Not to Nationalise a Gold Mine”, was published on Simons’ personal website on Saturday, April 19, 2025.
The article discusses Ghana’s management of the Damang gold mine and includes claims that E&P, described as “a powerful operator owned by the brother of Ghana’s President”, suffered financially following a temporary shutdown of operations by Gold Fields.
Simons also raised concerns about E&P’s alleged influence on the Minerals Commission, suggesting potential conflicts of interest and political interference.
Ibrahim Mahama and his company made the following claims in their suit:
a. A declaration that the statements made by the Defendant, which have been particularised in paragraphs 14(a) and (b) of the statement of claim, are defamatory of the Plaintiffs;
b. An order directed at the Defendant to publish, on the same platforms that he published the defamatory words, as well as a full page of the Daily Graphic newspaper, on six consecutive occasions over a 3-month period, an unqualified retraction and an apology to the Plaintiffs;
c. An order for a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant, his agents, assigns, and servants from further publishing any defamatory words against the Plaintiffs;
d. General damages of Ten Million Ghana Cedis (GH¢10,000,000.00) for defamation;
e. Costs, including legal fees; and
f. Any other order(s) as this Honourable Court may deem fit.
See the court document below:
BAI/MA