The lawmaker stated that based on the content of Zakou’s statement, the intent was not harmful but appeared to express concern for the Vice President’s well-being, suggesting she might need rest due to the intensity of recent political activities.
In an interview on Oyerepa TV on April 15, 2025, Shaib argued that Zakou’s words had been misinterpreted.
He explained that Zakou referred to the Vice President in a respectful and familiar manner and seemed to acknowledge the toll the election campaign may have taken on her health.
Shaib further raised concerns about the conduct of security personnel, criticizing them for allegedly holding Zakou beyond the legally permissible time frame without formally charging him.
He questioned whether the post, regardless of how it was perceived, warranted a prolonged detention, adding that similar comments have been made about other political figures in the past without such consequences.
He said, “Even if he had said rest in peace, must he be kept in custody for more than 48 hours?”
Zakou was later granted bail by the Achimota Circuit Court on April 14, 2025.
The bail was set at GH¢100,000 with two sureties. As part of his bail conditions, he must report weekly to the investigating officer.
The case has been scheduled for a case management hearing on May 12, 2025.
The controversy began on April 4, 2025, when Zakou made a Facebook post at around 4:00 a.m. featuring a photo of the Vice President with a caption that many perceived as misleading and alarming, especially given recent reports about her health.
The Vice President had been treated for a sudden illness at the University of Ghana Medical Centre on March 28 and was expected to receive further medical attention abroad.
Zakou’s post triggered strong reactions online, with many users accusing him of spreading misinformation and showing poor judgment in a sensitive situation.
Following the backlash, the National Intelligence Bureau reportedly detained Zakou over the weekend for questioning.
His arrest has since sparked public debate on the boundaries of free speech and responsible communication on social media.