However, he declined the request after realizing they had a predetermined narrative.
He recounted his interaction with the international media outlet, maintaining that he had done nothing improper.
Before the report was aired, he was approached for his response.
He provided evidence to prove his innocence, stating that he had no connection to the allegations.
However, despite his efforts to clarify the situation, he felt they were determined to proceed with their version of events.
“When the matter broke, and they were about to air it, they contacted me. I showed them evidence that I was innocent; I didn’t know anything about what they claimed I had done. But the more I explained, the more it became clear they just wanted to go ahead with their story,” he recounted.
Recognizing the futility of further discussion, Gyampo said he firmly rejected their approach.
He went on to describe how the controversy was not spontaneous but rather a well-orchestrated setup that took months to unfold.
According to him, the events leading to the allegations stretched over a three-month period. He explained that he had managed to navigate the situation carefully until a moment of goodwill was misinterpreted and used against him.
He asserted that the report was misleading, relying heavily on a narration that distorted the actual context of events.
He argued that significant portions of the conversation were intentionally omitted, leading to a misrepresentation of his statements.
He questioned why only selective parts of the discussion were included while the other participant’s words were excluded.
Gyampo also spoke about his wife’s reaction to the situation, emphasizing that there was no conflict at home.
He explained that his wife was aware of everything from the beginning, and there was never any disagreement between them regarding the matter.