Dr. Otu-Larbi began his post by recognizing Mahama’s accomplishments, particularly in the realm of governance. He expressed that, in the short period since taking office, Mahama’s leadership has been commendable, especially on matters of governance. However, he noted that praise should not overshadow the need for constructive criticism and improvement in key areas.
Despite his general approval, Dr. Otu-Larbi raised three primary concerns that he feels need immediate attention:
1. Galamsey: A Serious Concern
The first issue Dr. Otu-Larbi addressed was the ongoing challenge of illegal mining, or “galamsey,” in Ghana. He expressed disappointment with Mahama’s handling of the issue so far, criticizing the government for what he perceives as excessive talk but little substantive action. “Galamsey remains an existential threat to Ghanaians, and the president must take decisive action on it,” Dr. Otu-Larbi wrote, urging Mahama to enforce a complete ban on mining near rivers immediately. He argued that there is no need to delay such an action, as it could be implemented without extensive planning.
2. Dismissals of Workers
Dr. Otu-Larbi also voiced concerns about the dismissal of workers hired after December 7, 2024. While he understood the need to replace political appointees from the previous government, he strongly disagreed with the broad dismissal of public sector workers such as teachers and nurses. He acknowledged that similar actions had been taken by former President Akufo-Addo in 2017, but stressed that this should not be used as a justification for the current government’s actions. “We deserve better!” he stated, pointing out that the bar for leadership should not be set by a past administration that he considered to have lowered the standards of governance.
3. Questionable Appointments
The third criticism Dr. Otu-Larbi raised was regarding what he described as “job-for-the-boys” appointments. He pointed specifically to the appointment of Peter Otukonor as the Director of Presidential Initiatives in Agriculture and Agribusiness. Dr. Otu-Larbi questioned the necessity of this role, given that there are already multiple ministers and directors handling various aspects of agriculture. “There are 4 ministers in charge of various aspects of agriculture. There are several directors and civil servants in those ministries, so I sincerely do not see the need for the office created for Otukonor,” he remarked.
Source.