Prophet Adom Kyei Duah, the founder and leader of Believers Worship Center, has broken his silence on calls by some members of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) to refund money allegedly given to him by Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia during his election campaign. These demands arose following Dr. Bawumia’s loss in the recent elections, with some NPP supporters accusing the prophet of failing to deliver results.
The controversy started when certain NPP members took to social media, claiming that the prophet should return a large sum of money—dubbed a “one billion offering”—which they allege was contributed during Dr. Bawumia’s campaign. They implied that the money was given in hopes of securing divine intervention for electoral success.
However, during a church service, Prophet Adom Kyei Duah addressed the issue head-on. He stated unequivocally that he did not solicit the funds, and that the contribution was made willingly by Dr. Bawumia.
“I am not for sale,” the prophet declared to his congregation. “I don’t depend on anyone’s money to survive. I have more than enough, and I never asked for this offering.”
Prophet Adom also criticized those who believe that financial contributions to religious leaders guarantee specific outcomes, such as winning an election. He explained that his role as a spiritual leader is not transactional and emphasized the importance of understanding that spiritual support does not work on demand.
The prophet’s firm response has sparked varied reactions on social media. Some individuals have supported his stance, arguing that his refusal to refund the money demonstrates his independence. Others have taken a lighter view of the situation, with comments like “church money is not refundable” gaining traction online.
On the flip side, critics have raised ethical concerns about religious leaders accepting significant contributions during election periods. They question whether such actions blur the line between religion and politics and compromise the neutrality of spiritual figures.
This situation has reignited discussions about the relationship between religion and politics in Ghana. It is not uncommon for politicians to seek spiritual support during elections, but such interactions often lead to debates about the ethical boundaries of these engagements.
Prophet Adom Kyei Duah’s refusal to bow to demands for a refund highlights the importance of maintaining the independence of religious leaders. His bold statement underscores the need for politicians and their supporters to separate faith from political expectations.
The clash between Prophet Adom Kyei Duah and the dissatisfied NPP supporters raises important questions about the ethical implications of financial contributions to religious leaders. While the prophet’s stance reinforces his integrity, it also opens a broader conversation about the need to clearly define the roles of religion and politics in society.
This incident serves as a reminder that spiritual matters should not be intertwined with political ambitions, ensuring that both realms maintain their distinct purposes and principles.