Deborah Seyram Adablah has strongly reminded her sugar daddy, Mr. Ernest Kwasi Nimako, and the judge who presided over their legal dispute, declaring that the case is far from over.
This young woman gained significant attention both locally and internationally when she took her older lover to court, accusing him of violating their agreement to support her financially.
However, following the dismissal of the case by the High Court in Accra on Tuesday, November 28, 2023, Adablah has expressed her intention to appeal. Justice John Bosco Nabarese, who delivered the ruling on November 28, acknowledged the immorality of the relationship between Adablah and the former Chief Finance Officer of a bank but concluded that Seyram Adablah’s lawsuit lacked a valid legal basis.
The court firmly asserted that it should not endorse a relationship founded on immoral acts, stating, “You cannot recover the price of something you have committed in an immoral act.” Deborah Seyram Adablah was also ordered to pay a cost of GH¢10,000.
The ruling followed an application by the ex-CFO urging the court to strike Adablah’s case. Despite not granting interviews to the media following the court’s decision, Deborah Seyram Adablah utilized her TikTok page to express her unwavering commitment to pursue the legal dispute, emphasizing that the matter is still far from resolved.
She stated:
“A young male journalist approached me today and asked what I had to say to the ruling You guys were equally in court Was that the right thing for the judge Justice John Bosco Nabarese to do? Well, my counsel will apply for the ruling and apply the LAW accordingly -The case is NOT OVER! Absolutely NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW I saw you people taking videos and pictures, make sure the ones you’ll publish are catchy yeah Thank you.”
Background
Deborah Seyram Adablah’s suit, filed on Monday, January 23, 2023, alleged that Ernest Kwasi Nimako, whom she refers to as her “sugar daddy,” made several promises to her.
The plaintiff alleged that Nimako had agreed to purchase a car for her, cover her accommodation expenses for three years, provide a monthly stipend of GH¢3,000, marry her after divorcing his wife, and offer a lump sum to start a business. However, the plaintiff claims that Nimako took back the car, which was initially registered in his name, after just one year, depriving her of its use. Furthermore, she asserts that Nimako only paid for one year of accommodation, despite promising to cover three years.
The plaintiff is seeking a court order to compel Nimako, whom she refers to as her “sugar daddy,” to transfer the car’s title into her name and return the vehicle to her. She also requests that the court order Nimako to provide her with the lump sum agreed upon to start her own business, enabling her to support herself as previously agreed. Additionally, she seeks an order for Nimako to pay the outstanding two years’ worth of accommodation expenses, as per their agreement.
Furthermore, the plaintiff requests that the court order Nimako to cover her medical expenses resulting from a “side effect of a family planning treatment” that he had advised her to undergo in order to prevent pregnancy.